Both the reading passage and lecture discuss about mass-extinction event that occurred at the end of the Triassic period. The author presented several hypotheses to explain the plausible explanation of that event which eliminated numerous species within a short time. However, the lecturer casts doubts on these theories and refutes them all by providing several counter arguments.
To begin with, the author asserts that fluctuation of sea level was occurred at that time and sea levels were lowered which ultimately destroyed habitats that lived in the shallow areas of ocean and in coast areas. Consequently, overall food chain got effected which lead to mass extinctions. Although lecturer agrees with the fact that sea levels fall during that period, he finds that it is very unlikely that might cause extinction of diverse species. She also mentions that this change was not as rapid that could make dramatic impact as it is natural that habitats would adapt to change in environment over that period.
Secondly, the author argues that, widespread volcanic activity caused rise of SO2 in atmosphere which causes lowering in global temperature. Such transformation in weather caused severe extinction of many species. In the contrary, the lecturer contends that SO2 in the environment can not stay for long period and excess SO2 should be cleared in form of rain. Therefore, though climate cooling might occur but this scenario could not stay for much long period and make that hazardous impact.
Finally, the author holds the view that asteroid strike might displaced of soil and cracked rock, which caused a displacement of debris that can block out sunlight for a long period of time. According to the article, Earth collided with asteroid at that period which caused death of plants and eventually species died starving. On the other hand, the professor argued that researcher have not found any crater of that period. Though craters was discovered by scientists, but those occurred long before Triassic period and could not possibly block sunlight for that much time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... that can block out sunlight for a long period of time. According to the article, Earth collid...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 28.0 12.0772626932 232% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25449101796 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55473447161 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3374997675 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230895305324 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763928725634 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582578134263 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136699995184 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261845948894 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.