The passage and lecture about cheatgrass which is an invasive species of grass these grass cause damage to the animal habitats and drive out other native plants in north American field The writer claims there are three methods to solve the probles get fro

Essay topics:

The passage and lecture about cheatgrass, which is an invasive species of grass, these grass cause damage to the animal habitats and drive out other native plants in north American field. The writer claims, there are three methods to solve the probles get from quikly dominates cheatgrass. the lecturer casts doubt bon claim made vin articl. He says, these methods are not likely to work very well.
First, the author states, encourage animals such as cattle to feed on cheatgrass, he mentions, when graszers were released in field with cheatgrass, the cheatgrass would be reduced. This point challenged by lecturer. He says, cattles and live stock feed on cheatgrass and prefer other types of grass since will destroyother plant which are benefecial, as a result we get opposing effect.
Second, the author argues, buring the cheatgrass will help to eliminat vast amount of cheatgrass, and creating space for reseeded fields with native grass. This argument reputtes by professor. He illustrate, burn the cheatgrass also lead to burn other native grass and plant, furthermore, burn do not effect cheatgrass seeds which underneath ground, however these seeds can grow up and give alot of amount of cheatgrass.
Finally, the articl mention last option, that can introduce a fungal parasite that attacks cheatgrass and prevent them from reproducing, and make native species better compete against cheatgrass. In the ther hand, the professor claim, cheatgrass and parasite always live together, since cheatgrass will develope resistant to parasite, therefore the parasite can not harm cheatgrass, so this solution is not effcient.

The passage and lecture about cheatgrass, which is an invasive species of grass, these grass cause damage to the animal habitats and drive out other native plants in north American field. The writer claims, there are three methods to solve the probles get from quikly dominates cheatgrass. the lecturer casts doubt bon claim made vin articl. He says, these methods are not likely to work very well.
First, the author states, encourage animals such as cattle to feed on cheatgrass, he mentions, when graszers were released in field with cheatgrass, the cheatgrass would be reduced. This point challenged by lecturer. He says, cattles and live stock feed on cheatgrass and prefer other types of grass since will destroyother plant which are benefecial, as a result we get opposing effect.
Second, the author argues, buring the cheatgrass will help to eliminat vast amount of cheatgrass, and creating space for reseeded fields with native grass. This argument reputtes by professor. He illustrate, burn the cheatgrass also lead to burn other native grass and plant, furthermore, burn do not effect cheatgrass seeds which underneath ground, however these seeds can grow up and give alot of amount of cheatgrass.
Finally, the articl mention last option, that can introduce a fungal parasite that attacks cheatgrass and prevent them from reproducing, and make native species better compete against cheatgrass. In the ther hand, the professor claim, cheatgrass and parasite always live together, since cheatgrass will develope resistant to parasite, therefore the parasite can not harm cheatgrass, so this solution is not effcient.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-12-07 talelaldabous 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture about cheatgrass...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...s get from quikly dominates cheatgrass. the lecturer casts doubt bon claim made vin...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ods are not likely to work very well. First, the author states, encourage anim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d prefer other types of grass since will destroyother plant which are benefecial...
^^
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...since will destroyother plant which are benefecial, as a result we get opposing ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l, as a result we get opposing effect. Second, the author argues, buring the ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
...This argument reputtes by professor. He illustrate, burn the cheatgrass also lead to burn ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ass and plant, furthermore, burn do not effect cheatgrass seeds which underneath groun...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and give alot of amount of cheatgrass. Finally, the articl mention last option,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ass, so this solution is not effcient.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, so, therefore, well, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37890625 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61161662229 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6328125 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9054045111 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444538550866 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153417195413 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.200317279816 0.0662205650399 303% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286825988148 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.246786723256 0.0443174109184 557% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.