The passage and lecture talk about several solution that prevent birds from injuries from using glass material for building. the author elaborates on three solutions to prevent this accident. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He says non of these methods are practical.
First, writer suggests using one way glass material. This will give chance to people indide building to get light, but brids can see that there is a barriar in the other side. The professor contradicts this solution. He mentions, this way is not effective. One side glass will acts as a mirror. Therefore, birds will see sky or trees reflected on the wall. Hence, they will continue in flying and hurt themseleves when hit the glass wall
Second, passage stats, when we put color design like strips on glass will make birds to avoidit. And people in side building still see out side from glass between strips. The professor refutes this statement. He says, birds may sse space between these strips, therefore they will want to pass it. If we want to avoid this problem, we need to increase width of strips. As a result, people can not see from thin space.
Finally, the author mention magnetic field as a solution to this problem. He suggest putting magnetic charge in the wall, and bird can recognize this charge. The lecturer in the other hand states, bird use this magnetic field in long distant migration but in short distant movement they use their eyes or brightness for navigation
The passage and lecture talk about several solution that prevent birds from injuries from using glass material for building. the author elaborates on three solutions to prevent this accident. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He says non of these methods are practical.
First, writer suggests using one way glass material. This will give chance to people indide building to get light, but brids can see that there is a barriar in the other side. The professor contradicts this solution. He mentions, this way is not effective. One side glass will acts as a mirror. Therefore, birds will see sky or trees reflected on the wall. Hence, they will continue in flying and hurt themseleves when hit the glass wall
Second, passage stats, when we put color design like strips on glass will make birds to avoidit. And people in side building still see out side from glass between strips. The professor refutes this statement. He says, birds may sse space between these strips, therefore they will want to pass it. If we want to avoid this problem, we need to increase width of strips. As a result, people can not see from thin space.
Finally, the author mention magnatic feild as a solution to this problem. He suggestb to put magnatic charge in the wall, and bird can recognize this charge. The lecturer in the other hand states, bird use this magnatic field in long distancr migration but in short distancr movementb they use their eyes or brightness for navigation
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-31 | talelaldabous | 71 | view |
- The passage and lecture discuss burning coal by product which is called coal ash that has many harmful chemical material and how the government propose to create a new strict regulation for handling and storing The author claims that new regulations are u 76
- Now a days life put on our shoulders tremendious tasks which have to finish them Therefore we should deal with our time precisely The question whether peoples spend their time by doing some things enjoyable or by doing their important duties This can be w 60
- Many situation in our life need from as to make a decision Making this decision has a crucial influence of our future Whether young people in the past depend completely on their parents to make such important decision and today youngsters are more indepen 66
- The readind and lecturer about Torreya trees inFlorida and how to save these trees from decline The author claims three way to save the tree The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in lecture She said these ways infortunatly incorrect First the author ment 76
- The reading and lecture about the possibilty of life on venus The author believes that there it is imposible to live on venus The lecturer casts doubts on claims made in the arlicle he sayes we can find life on venus if we do flooting station on it first 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun solution seems to be countable; consider using: 'several solutions'.
Suggestion: several solutions
The passage and lecture talk about several solution that prevent birds from injuries from u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...from using glass material for building. the author elaborates on three solutions to...
^^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'act'
Suggestion: act
...y is not effective. One side glass will acts as a mirror. Therefore, birds will see ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt themseleves when hit the glass wall Second, passage stats, when we put color...
^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: OUT_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outside'?
Suggestion: outside
.... And people in side building still see out side from glass between strips. The professo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, people can not see from thin space. Finally, the author mention magnatic fei...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83464566929 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32999031279 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582677165354 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.553079124 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.6315789474 110.228320801 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.3684210526 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416699490055 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121944474931 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143662777424 0.0662205650399 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299477698035 0.162205337803 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.295176603507 0.0443174109184 666% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.3589403974 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.