The passage and lecture talk about several solution that prevent birds from injuries from using glass material for building. the author elaborates on three solutions to prevent this accident. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He says non of these methods are practical.
First, writer suggests using one way glass material. This will give chance to people indide building to get light, but brids can see that there is a barriar in the other side. The professor contradicts this solution. He mentions, this way is not effective. One side glass will acts as a mirror. Therefore, birds will see sky or trees reflected on the wall. Hence, they will continue in flying and hurt themseleves when hit the glass wall
Second, passage stats, when we put color design like strips on glass will make birds to avoidit. And people in side building still see out side from glass between strips. The professor refutes this statement. He says, birds may sse space between these strips, therefore they will want to pass it. If we want to avoid this problem, we need to increase width of strips. As a result, people can not see from thin space.
Finally, the author mention magnetic field as a solution to this problem. He suggest putting magnetic charge in the wall, and bird can recognize this charge. The lecturer in the other hand states, bird use this magnetic field in long distant migration but in short distant movement they use their eyes or brightness for navigation
The passage and lecture talk about several solution that prevent birds from injuries from using glass material for building. the author elaborates on three solutions to prevent this accident. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He says non of these methods are practical.
First, writer suggests using one way glass material. This will give chance to people indide building to get light, but brids can see that there is a barriar in the other side. The professor contradicts this solution. He mentions, this way is not effective. One side glass will acts as a mirror. Therefore, birds will see sky or trees reflected on the wall. Hence, they will continue in flying and hurt themseleves when hit the glass wall
Second, passage stats, when we put color design like strips on glass will make birds to avoidit. And people in side building still see out side from glass between strips. The professor refutes this statement. He says, birds may sse space between these strips, therefore they will want to pass it. If we want to avoid this problem, we need to increase width of strips. As a result, people can not see from thin space.
Finally, the author mention magnatic feild as a solution to this problem. He suggestb to put magnatic charge in the wall, and bird can recognize this charge. The lecturer in the other hand states, bird use this magnatic field in long distancr migration but in short distancr movementb they use their eyes or brightness for navigation
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-31 | talelaldabous | 71 | view |
- The reading passage and lecture are both discussing type of great houses used by settlement of Chaco canyon in New Mexico The writer claims three theories to explain how these buildings were used However the lecture casts doubt on claim made in article He 75
- The passage and lecture are both talking about using of vesseles which are found by archaelogist in Iraque as electric batteries The author claims three reasons which contradicts using of these vesseles as batteries The lecturer casts doubt on claim made 65
- The rules have important effect on managing our societies whether these rules that young people have to obey are too strict this can be weighed in manu deffirent aspect in my perseptive I do not concur with the statement that says the rules that societies 70
- The government has plays important rule in enhancing welfare to the general public Whether the governments should fund money to improve internet access or to improve public transportations this can be evaluated in many aspects in my opinion I concur with 70
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about carved stone ball which are type of artifact found in Scotland The writer claims three diffirent using of this stone ball The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions no one of these 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun solution seems to be countable; consider using: 'several solutions'.
Suggestion: several solutions
The passage and lecture talk about several solution that prevent birds from injuries from u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...from using glass material for building. the author elaborates on three solutions to...
^^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'act'
Suggestion: act
...y is not effective. One side glass will acts as a mirror. Therefore, birds will see ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt themseleves when hit the glass wall Second, passage stats, when we put color...
^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: OUT_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outside'?
Suggestion: outside
.... And people in side building still see out side from glass between strips. The professo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, people can not see from thin space. Finally, the author mention magnatic fei...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83464566929 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32999031279 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582677165354 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.553079124 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.6315789474 110.228320801 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.3684210526 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416699490055 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121944474931 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143662777424 0.0662205650399 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299477698035 0.162205337803 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.295176603507 0.0443174109184 666% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.3589403974 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.