The reading passage abd lecture are both about existing of bee on earth as early as 200 million years. the author claims three evident to support that bee did not exist on earth at that time. THe lecturer casts doubt on claim made3 in the article. She mentions, presence of bee on earth early is convenience.
First, the reading states, no fossiles for bee present before 100 million years ago, these fossils might to other species not to bees. The lecturer contradictes this statement, She believe, absence of fossiles do not mean there species were not bees. bees fossiles need special type of tree to preserve them, these trees have a type of resin which is important to preserve bees. Therefore, there wrer no fossiles foud before 100 million years because, there were no tree that time.
Second, writer argues, absence of flowers indicates that bees did not present in that time, because bees depend on flowers for feeding. This argument is refuted by professor. She elaborates on, bees that time depand on other type of food rather than flowers like some types of trees. Then after growing of flower, they began to use them as food.
Finally, the author illustrates to special structure which is found in bees nest and did not find in fossels of that species nests. The professor in the other hand explains. it is true that fossils of bees do not have caps like other insects. But in tnhe other hand, modren bees water aprove compound to protect their nest which are the same materials that used by these species which are found before 200 million years ago.
The reading passage abd lecture are both about existing of bee on earth as early as 200 million years. the author claims three evident to support that bee did not exist on earth at that time. THe lecturer casts doubt on claim made3 in the article. She mentions, presence of bee on earth early is convenience.
First, the reading states, no fossiles for bee present before 100 million years ago, these fossils might to other species not to bees. The lecturer contradictes this statement, She believe, absence of fossiles do not mean there species were not bees. bees fossiles need special type of tree to preserve them, these trees have a type of resin which is important to preserve bees. Therefore, there wrer no fossiles foud before 100 million years because, there were no tree that time.
Second, writer argues, absence of flowers indicates that bees did not present in that time, because bees depend on flowers for feeding. This argument is refuted by professor. She elaborates on, bees that time depand on other type of food rather than flowers like some types of trees. Then after growing of flower, they began to use them as food.
Finally, the author illustrates to special structure which is found in bees nest and did not find in fossels of that species nests. The professor in the other hand explains. it is true that fossils of bees do not have caps like other insects. But in tnhe other hand, modren bees water aprove compound to protect their nest which are the same materials that used by these species which are found before 200 million years ago.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-09 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The reading passage and lecture both disccus massive extinctions that cause decline nspeciese polpulation The author claims three explations to explain why this extinction happened The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article She mentions non of t 60
- The reading amd lecture talk about thoeries which mayb lead to extinction of some living organism in the Triassic period The author believes that this extiniction explained by three theories The lecturer cases doubts on claim which is made by author she d 60
- The reading passage and the lecture are talking about people who buy franchise from other companies to begin there own business The author claims several advantages from buying franchise However the professor casts doubt on claim made in article She has d 70
- The reading passage and the lecture are both discussing the possibility of using discovered vessels in Iraq as a batteries to introduce electricity The writer gives three reasons to explain that these vessels were not used as batteries However the lecture 60
- The passage and lecture about cloud deeding which is method used to hail pellets fall and destroy cropes The author claims that these cloud seeding has been effective in protection crops from hail by spraying chemical silver iodide on storm cloud from air 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage abd lecture are both...
^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...on earth as early as 200 million years. the author claims three evident to support ...
^^^
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...cturer contradictes this statement, She believe, absence of fossiles do not mean there ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Bees
...o not mean there species were not bees. bees fossiles need special type of tree to p...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lower, they began to use them as food. Finally, the author illustrates to speci...
^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...e professor in the other hand explains. it is true that fossils of bees do not hav...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, so, then, therefore, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74358974359 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18456330105 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534798534799 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0398434295 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9375 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407047236111 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14731360025 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177176643957 0.0662205650399 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287677778291 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.315729416085 0.0443174109184 712% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.