The passage mainly presents that asteroid would be the best colonization choice for human for several reasons. However, the listening challenges what are stated in the passage by providing three strong evidences.

Essay topics:

The passage mainly presents that asteroid would be the best colonization choice for human for several reasons. However, the listening challenges what are stated in the passage by providing three strong evidences.

The passage mainly presents that asteroid would be the best colonization choice for human for several reasons. However, the listening challenges what are stated in the passage by providing three strong evidences.

First of all, in the reading, it is said that asteroids have so lower gravity that it is continent for people to land on them. On the contrary, the listening holds an opposite idea that the low gravity has some risks. That’s because low gravity is harmful for people’s health. People will lose muscle and bone density constantly. It is hard to imagine the health problems that stay long time on asteroids.

In addition, the passage asserts that some asteroids are rich in elements and precious metals and they can be mine. However, the professor refutes this theory by stating the fact that mining on the asteroids may not be very profitable. The costs of supporting a colony and of transporting the metals are very high. And there is no grantee that the price sell of mental can remain same price. If the supply of the mental increase, they will have lower profit.

Finally, the author of the reading believes that asteroids are easy to reach. However, the lecturer disagrees it with the point that it is difficult to return back. That’s because asteroids are more and more far away from earth. Therefore, asteroids cannot stay close to earth and they can even travel farther away from earth than Mars.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-10 地狱博士后 61 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user 地狱博士后 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'lowed', 'lowered'.
Suggestion: lowed; lowered
...ding, it is said that asteroids have so lower gravity that it is continent for people...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 153, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
... with the point that it is difficult to return back. That's because asteroids are more...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, in addition, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98347107438 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5061906822 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578512396694 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.3127749249 49.2860985944 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.375 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.125 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391804117008 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110883540381 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197248533521 0.0662205650399 298% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308290473669 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.399767019557 0.0443174109184 902% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.