In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to continue, with the result that the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline. First, as human populations and settlements continue to expand, birds' natural habitats will continue to disappear. Forests, wetlands, and grasslands will give way to ever more homes, malls, and offices. As the traditional areas suitable for birds keep decreasing, so will the size of the bird populations that depend on those vanishing habitats. Second, agricultural activities must increase to keep pace with the growing human population. The growth of agriculture will also result in the further destruction of bird habitats asmore and more wilderness areas are converted to agricultural use. As a result, bird populations in rural areas will continue to decline. Third, as human settlements expand and agriculture increases, the use ofchemical pesticides will also increase. Pesticides are poisons designed to kill agricultural and home garden pests, such as insects, but inevitably, pesticides get into the water and into the food chain for birds where they can harm birds. Birds that eat the poisoned insects or drink contaminated water can die as a result, and even if pesticides do not kill birds outright, they can prevent them from reproducing successfully. Sopesticides have significantly contributed to declines in bird population, and because there will continue to be a need to control agricultural pests in the future, this decline will continue.
In the reading passage, the author discusses three kinds of the ways that will effect the birds population in the future, while the lecturer claims that what the reading passage states is not convincing and disputes all of the ways presented in the reading passage by several proofs.
First, both the text and the talk discusses about the idea of the steady growth in the human population. In this regard, the belief in the reading passage is that human will continue to disappear birds habitats since they need more place to locate growing human population. the speaker admits growing in human population and the settlements affect, but not as the reading passage states. According to the speaker, it will effect some bird species not all.
Second, both the reading and the listening material put forth the idea of the agricultural activities. In this vein, the writer states that agricultural activities have to increase to feed all of the human population which in and of itself will distract the birds population because more and more land will be used for agricultural purposes, while the lecturer views to this issue is from an apposite angle. According to the lecturer, in United States in each passing year, fewer and fewer land were used for plant crops because of the new productive crops.
Third, the author in the reading passage make point that more pesticides will use in the agriculture area which in turn will harm the birds population. On the other hand, the professor illustrates that it is true about the traditional pesticides. Also, new important development will change process. First is the new less toxin pesticides and second crops which is more resistance against the pests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...usses three kinds of the ways that will effect the birds population in the future, whi...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
... kinds of the ways that will effect the birds population in the future, while the lec...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e states is not convincing and disputes all of the ways presented in the reading passage b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ace to locate growing human population. the speaker admits growing in human populat...
^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ates. According to the speaker, it will effect some bird species not all. Second, ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ral activities have to increase to feed all of the human population which in and of itself...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...hich in and of itself will distract the birds population because more and more land w...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...ulture area which in turn will harm the birds population. On the other hand, the prof...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, third, while, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02816901408 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53973579046 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489436619718 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.6455550578 49.2860985944 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181003313803 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641216547421 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500241742002 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10549170376 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518851546666 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.