People in the past are more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now
That in today’s world, people’s neighborhood is affected by many assorted reasons in an axiom, both personal and social parameters are influence people neighborhood. A question, which is the matter of debate, a controversial one, is the difference of people’s interest improving to their neighborhood in the past and now. Although, it is hard to reach consensus on this issue, I am, to a great extent on the belief that people had more interest to have communicate with their neighbors in the past. The following reasons would elaborate on the thesis.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justifies the thesis is that people are busier in now days or in the past. To put it in general words, the majority of people going to on work every day and in the night they must go to bed. Simply state, they do not have time to have a conversation or interaction with their neighbors to improve their neighborhood. Going into depth, the more people prefer spend extra time with their family or use it for resting to prepare themselves for work. Needless to say that job has big effect on the lives and good resting for doing work could be a guarantee for people’s jobs. According to the results of study that published in Elsevier journal, more that 60% of people, which they did not have appropriate resting, they cannot doing their job as well as normal condition.
Alongside with the first reason elaborated above, the social networks have big effect on reducing the sympathy between neighbors. To clarify, people like to have connection with each other by their cellphone instead to visit directly. Broadly speaking, use of social network is easier and comfortable to connect with other people; the major consequent of these tools is saving time. To delineate, the majority of people want a comfortable life and use everything to catch this purpose. However, what I mention in above might not generalized to all contexts, some people who use social networks have a good life with best quality and they are so satisfied.
Drawing upon the reasons, although there are always some exceptions, which are excluded from general rule, I agree with this issue that people are interested to improving the neighborhoods in the past. The recapitulate the reasons, improving the good interaction with neighbors is valuable things, but this value is missed for many recent decades.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 469, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'communicated'.
Suggestion: communicated
...f that people had more interest to have communicate with their neighbors in the past. The f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 611, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the best'.
Suggestion: with the best
...ho use social networks have a good life with best quality and they are so satisfied. Dra...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...mproving the neighborhoods in the past. The recapitulate the reasons, improving the good interac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alue is missed for many recent decades.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, well, broadly speaking, in general, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 30.3222958057 231% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1373.03311258 146% => OK
No of words: 400.0 270.72406181 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0125 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80217660935 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 145.348785872 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5521857587 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.941176471 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5294117647 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3173521976 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104040379963 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850553452917 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198755698145 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985942902135 0.0443174109184 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.