Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in
The article discusses that if proffesors appear as guests on television news programs these televisin appearances will create great benefits to professors themselves as well as to their universities and the general public. The passage provides three reasons to support that. In contrast, the professor in the lecture refutes all these three reasons by stating that these reasons are not convincing.
First, the article claims that professors by publising vies in academic journals only allow to other scholars to learn about these views, but by being in television programs they can have a lot of viewer. However, the professor describes that most of the professional professors do not have time to this kind of works and being in television programs is just suitable to ordinary professors who really do not have enough money to do their experiments. Furthermore, expert professors have been invited to professional scientific academies not to an entertaining program. So, the mentioned reason in the article is not true.
Second, the reading argues that universities benefit from such appearances because university receive positive publicity. In spite of this view, the lecture explains that such appearances take too much time of professors. They ahve to spend their time to travel or for preparing to the show. In this way, they do not have enough time to communicate with their students and also, their absence in the university can cause problems. Consequently, the text's reason is not true.
Third, the reading asserts that the public can benefit from professors' appearing on television. While the lecture describes that most of the time this kind of programs just need academic titles and detailes about different subjects, but professors have a lot of things to present. People can gain this kind of reports from other television programs. As you can see, professors's appearance in television programs are not ony useless but also time-consuming.
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task 71
- TPO 02 integrated writing 3
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- tpo 30- independent 3
- TPO 4- INTEGRATED WRITING 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s well as to their universities and the general public. The passage provides three reasons to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irst, the article claims that professors by publising vies in academic journals o...
^^
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun viewer seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of viewers'.
Suggestion: a lot of viewers
...ng in television programs they can have a lot of viewer. However, the professor describes that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, really, second, so, third, well, while, as to, in contrast, kind of, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30225080386 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87750990872 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511254019293 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1363422503 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0625 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221062773588 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07011237532 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520205009356 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137111936542 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179496012416 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.