T P O-06 - Integrated Writing Task Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is speci
The passage discusses the drawbacks of the online encyclopedias and provides three reasons for describing these flaws. However, the professor refutes each o the author's reason by stating these online encyclopedias are helpful. So, the professor provides three reasons.
First, the reading states authors of these online encyclopedias lack academic credintials and these people are not reliable for writing these important subjects. Also, the text adds that there are errors in these articles maybe because of their unprofessional writers. The lecture refutes this idea by explaining these kind of errors are exist even in the printed encyclopedias. The professor states that correcting these errors in printed books are very dificult in comparison with online ones. Making theerrors correct in online encyclopedias is very simple.
Second, the pasage contends that vandals and hackers have the opportunity to manipulate, delete and even worse corrupt the prepared information. However, the professor asserts there are different strategies that we can use for preventing these kind of scandals. For example, we can use many determined editors for editing these articles. So, others cannot manipulate data. Also, we can provide read only texts for users. As a result, the professor thinks there are solutions to solve the hack problem and she rejects the text's idea.
Third, the reading states online encyclopedias focus on depth of trivial topics. So, these topics create false effects in the community. While, the professor thinks there is a good point in online encyclopedias that there is not in printed ones and it is about the space. She describes thate there are a lot of spaces in online websites and we put a lot of information in inline encyclopedias but there are limitations in printed books. So, she thinks the online encyclopedias solve the space problem. As we can see, the professor rejects the reading's reason.
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TOEFL T P O 45 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 25 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...lecture refutes this idea by explaining these kind of errors are exist even in the printed...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
... by explaining these kind of errors are exist even in the printed encyclopedias. The ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...rategies that we can use for preventing these kind of scandals. For example, we can use ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'texts'' or 'text's'?
Suggestion: texts'; text's
...ve the hack problem and she rejects the texts idea. Third, the reading states online...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, while, for example, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34539473684 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80434335851 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5347570383 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.25 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145589617475 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513528255139 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527285564903 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970730875384 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557802170414 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.