providing an international fund to protect the world's forests
The reading presents providing an international fund is the most effective way to protect the world's forests. Due to the increasing the influences to forests. The professor, however, challenges the claims made in the article and refutes them all.
First, the author asserts that this funding would allow farmers, government, and land owners to resist intrusion by the industries. In contrast, the lecturer proves that th larger the population, the more force toward land. which means utilizing fertilizer and pesticides by farmers to develop their cultivation cause water poollution and harm envirnment.
The writer suggests that funding could improve the villagers' economic situation. To combat this suggestion, the speaker proposes that this dispesion goes to government not villages' residents. In addition, nobody can garrantee the protection of forests through this process.
Finally, the article recommends that it would be beneficiary to biodiversity by protecting species from exploition, endangerment and extinction. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that government wouldn't plant trees without commercial goals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 83 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | jamessolo20 | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-25 | fmichela | 76 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | powsee | 90 | view |
| 2020-08-22 | Srutvik | 71 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...population, the more force toward land. which means utilizing fertilizer and pesticid...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 202, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... the other hand, posits that government wouldnt plant trees without commercial goals. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t plant trees without commercial goals.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, so, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 165.0 270.72406181 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93939393939 5.08290768461 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94101173849 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.715151515152 0.540411800872 132% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 419.366225166 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5255217816 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0909090909 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221073565588 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686563874445 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127514227661 0.0662205650399 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111196744591 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991242864616 0.0443174109184 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.58 12.2367328918 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.42419426049 121% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.