origin of Voynich manuscript
The reading presents some theories regarding the origin of Voynich manuscript, a great illustrated handwritten book written on vellum, a kind of material used for writing before the introduction of paper. The passage says that it looks like a magical book because the content cannot be understood. The professor, however, finds the idea dubious and refutes all of the claims made in the article.
First, the author suggests that it have been written by Anthony Ascham who was a sixteenth-century physician and botanist. The lecturer, on the other hand, argues that Ascham was an ordinary physician who had some usual ideas abaut herbal things. Thus, according to his knowledge he couldn't have written such an mysterious manuscript.
Furthermore, the writer asserts that it is a fake manuscript written by Edward Kelley for acquiring money from rich. On the other hand, the speaker contends that if Kelley had wanted to write something fake to gain money, he woudn't have done such a magical, creative and time-consming work.
Finally, the author states that it is something fake written by Voynich himself. In contrast, the professor proves that the ink dates back to thousands of years before Voynich. In addition, the Vollum is older than time of Voinich's life. Therefore, he hasn't written this manuscript as somethng fake to sell.
Furthermore, the speaker asserts that the manuscript resembles a scientific and mysterious work. Therefore, it is plausible that Anthony Ascham has written that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | NIMA SAEEDI | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | pari sa | 86 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | servatan7 | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-07 | servatan7 | 80 | view |
- tpo 34-2 71
- workers are more satisfied when they have different types of tasks. 70
- tpo 35 3
- tpo 37 3
- High school teachers (teachers of age 14-18) spend most of the class time lecturing while the students listen and take note. Other high school teachers spend mmost of the class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involed in and exchan 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cause the content cannot be understood. The professor, however, finds the idea dubi...
^^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ver, finds the idea dubious and refutes all of the claims made in the article. First...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll of the claims made in the article. First, the author suggests that it have ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...gs. Thus, according to his knowledge he couldnt have written such an mysterious manuscr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... knowledge he couldnt have written such an mysterious manuscript. Furthermore...
^^
Line 13, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...an time of Voinichs life. Therefore, he hasnt written this manuscript as somethng fak...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32916666667 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8112373709 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2058929348 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3571428571 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212141757628 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645392769158 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769000059676 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108271664208 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612006450985 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.