tpo 35
The reading resent some theories regarding the origin of Voynich manuscript, a great illustrated handwritten book written on vellum, a kind of material used for writing before the introduction of paper. The passage says that it looks like a magical book because the content cannot be understood. The professor, however, finds the idea dubious and refutes all of the claims made in the article.
First, the author suggests that it have been written by Anthony Ascham who was a sixteenth-century physician and botanist. The lecturer, on the other hand, argues that Ascham was an ordinary physician who had some usual ideas abaut herbal things. Thus, according to his knowledge he couldn't have written such an mysterious manuscript.
Furthermore, the writer asserts that it is a fake manuscript written by Edward Kelley for acquiring money from rich. On the other hand, the speaker contends that if Kelley had wanted to write something fake to gain money, he woudn't have done such a magical, creative and time-consming work.
Finally, the author states that it is something fake written by Voynich himself. In contrast, the professor proves that the ink dates back to thousands of years before Voynich. In addition, the Vollum is older than time of Voinich's life. Therefore, he hasn't written this manuscript as somethng fake to sell.
- It is more enjoyable to have a job when you work only three days a week for long hours than have a job when you work five days a week for shorter hours? 60
- Edmontosaurus' migration 3
- famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have much more privacy than they have. 66
- providing an international fund to protect the world's forests 76
- efficacy of cloud seeding 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cause the content cannot be understood. The professor, however, finds the idea dubi...
^^^
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ver, finds the idea dubious and refutes all of the claims made in the article. First...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll of the claims made in the article. First, the author suggests that it have ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...gs. Thus, according to his knowledge he couldnt have written such an mysterious manuscr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... knowledge he couldnt have written such an mysterious manuscript. Furthermore...
^^
Line 13, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...an time of Voinichs life. Therefore, he hasnt written this manuscript as somethng fak...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20276497696 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75487401556 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626728110599 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9047476986 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0833333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.