The reading and lecture mainly about yellow cedar trees which are common in North America The writer believes that these trees have been declining and he mentions three hypotheses to explaine this decline The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article

Essay topics:

The reading and lecture mainly about yellow cedar trees which are common in North America. The writer believes that these trees have been declining, and he mentions three hypotheses to explaine this decline. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He says these hypotheses are improperiat, and they are not the cause of decrease in the cadar population.
First, the author illustrates, yellow cedar trees decline may be caused by insect parasites, especialy cedar bark beetle which attacks and kill the yellow cedars. This point challenges by professor. He elaborate, these trees resist to insects attack, especialy healthy trees, theweak or ise insects can kill only ill trees, therfore the declination occur in these trees not only by the bark beetle.
Second, the author states, another cause of declination is bears which feed on bark, because these barks contain as much suger as berries, so aggressive feeding habits weaken enoupg trees to be responsible for decline. The professor rebuts this argument. He mentions,bears do not find in area that declination occur on it, in addition the declination occur in both areas which have or do not have bears.
Finally, the author suggests, the decreasing in cedar trees population duev to gragual change in climate, this lead to growing of cedar trees in winter, furthermore, it will suffer damagevfrom partial freezing, moreover undermining the health of the whole tree, and killing them. The lecturer in the other hand informs, the climate effect high cold level of the trees not the low warm level, for this reason this hypotheses is also incorrect.

The reading and lecture mainly about yellow cedar trees which are common in North America. The writer believes that these trees have been declining, and he mentions three hypotheses to explaine this decline. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He says these hypotheses are improperiat, and they are not the cause of decrease in the cadar population.
First, the author illustrates, yellow cedar trees decline may be caused by insect parasites, especialy cedar bark beetle which attacks and kill the yellow cedars. This point challenges by professor. He elaborate, these trees resist to insects attack, especialy healthy trees, theweak or ise insects can kill only ill trees, therfore the declination occur in these trees not only by the bark beetle.
Second, the author states, another cause of declination is bears which feed on bark, because these barks contain as much suger as berries, so aggressive feeding habits weaken enoupg trees to be responsible for decline. The professor rebuts this argument. He mentions,bears do not find in area that declination occur on it, in addition the declination occur in both areas which have or do not have bears.
Finally, the author suggests, the decreasing in cedar trees population duev to gragual change in climate, this lead to growing of cedar trees in winter, furthermore, it will suffer damagevfrom partial freezing, moreover undermining the health of the whole tree, and killing them. The lecturer in the other hand informs, the climate effect high cold level of the trees not the low warm level, for this reason this hypotheses is also incorrect.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-19 talelaldabous 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and lecture mainly about yel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ee hypotheses to explaine this decline. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of decrease in the cadar population. First, the author illustrates, yellow ce...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the declination occur in these trees not only by the bark beetle. Se...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se trees not only by the bark beetle. Second, the author states, another cause...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , bears
...fessor rebuts this argument. He mentions,bears do not find in area that declination oc...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...areas which have or do not have bears. Finally, the author suggests, the decrea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... change in climate, this lead to growing of cedar trees in winter, furthermore, i...
^^
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...not the low warm level, for this reason this hypotheses is also incorrect.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, may, moreover, second, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17175572519 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5971172043 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587786259542 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.1704156215 49.2860985944 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.916666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.528108776439 0.272083759551 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187617395541 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142726875424 0.0662205650399 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31742799584 0.162205337803 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.217756752204 0.0443174109184 491% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.