The reading passage and lecture are both about the Salton sea California salty island lake. The passage claims three ideas to decrease salinity of that lake. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He states, these solution are impractical.
First, the author states, the salinity of lake can be reduced by remove salt from the lake by desalination. The professor contradicts this method. He mentions, desalination remove water from lake and leave salt and other chemical material which may be poison and harmful to the human being. When there is wind, these chemicals may spread in the air and harm people. therefore this method is not work perfectly.
Second, the author argues, dilute lake water by adding water from sea. The ocean water can bring to the lake through pipelines or canals. The lecturer refutes this argument. He says, building pipelines and canals need a lot of many. Salton sea far away from ocean about 100 KM, these long distance want a lot of many to extend the canals to bring water from ocean to the lake.
Finally, the writer suggests build walls to divide lake to sections, smaller one would be allowed to increase salinity. The professor in the other hand mentions, lake found in area with geological activity like earthquakes. This earth movement may destroy the walls and lead to flow of water in small section which has high salinity and mixed with other department. As a result this solution dose not solve the problem because it does not work for long time.
The reading passage and lecture are both about the Salton sea California salty island lake. The passage claims three ideas to decrease salinity of that lake. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He states, these solution are impractical.
First, the author states, the salinity of lake can be reduced by remove salt from the lake by desalination. The professor contradicts this method. He mentions, desalination remove water from lake and leave salt and other chemical material which may be poison and harmful to the human being. When there is wind, these chemicals may spread in the air and harm people. therefore this method is not work perfectly.
Second, the author argues, dilute lake water by adding water from sea. The ocean water can bring to the lake through pipelines or canals. The lecturer refutes this argument. He says, building pipelines and canals need a lot of many. Salton sea far away from ocean about 100 KM, these long distance want a lot of many to extend the canals to bring water from ocean to the lake.
Finally, the writer suggests build walls to divide lake to sections, smaller one would be allowed to increase salinity. The professor in the other hand mentions, lake found in area with geological activity like earthquakes. This earth movement may destroy the walls and lead to flow of water in small section which has high salinity and mixed with other department. As a result this solution dose not solve the problem because it does not work for long time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-17 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The passage and lecture are mainly about burning mirror which is type of weapon used by Creek to defence themselives from Roman attack readind passage claim that story of burning mirror is just myth Lecturer castsc doubt on claim made in article She menti 76
- The passage and lecture are mainly about air purifiers the author claims that purifiers have beneficial effect to protect our health he gave three types of purifiers the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article he says the purifiers are non effective 76
- The reading passage and lecture disccus funding for concervation techniqes in forest protection to reverse negative trend that imperil our forest The writer claims several benefits from international funding The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the a 70
- Students are affect by different persons The question is whether teachers or friends have pramount effect on yougsters This can be weighed in many aspects Admittedly some believe kids influnce by kind teachers hence they be willing to be close with their 66
- Parent should pay attention for their kids and take care of them They have to spend enough time with their children and build a strong relationship between them Some parent prefer spend that time by playing game or sport other use the time doing together 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...deas to decrease salinity of that lake. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this solution' or 'these solutions'?
Suggestion: this solution; these solutions
...bt on claim made in article. He states, these solution are impractical. First, the author s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tates, these solution are impractical. First, the author states, the salinity o...
^^
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... may spread in the air and harm people. therefore this method is not work perfectly. Se...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
... may spread in the air and harm people. therefore this method is not work perfectly. Se...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to bring water from ocean to the lake. Finally, the writer suggests build walls...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86381322957 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33381957387 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575875486381 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8078289943 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.4444444444 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2777777778 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364093659032 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123698479261 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158195353696 0.0662205650399 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27894435615 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.309035974177 0.0443174109184 697% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.