The reading passage and lecture are both discussing the advantages of communal online encyclopedias over traditional one. The writer claims three problems with using online encyclopedias. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She contends, these problems never be perfect.
First, the writer states, the information in traditional books are written by experts people, therefore, they have academic credentials. The online information lake of this credentail, they have many errors. This statement is challenged by professor, She mentions, the errors in the online encyclopedias can easily correct and edit. Moreover, books never closely perfect. Any errors in traditional books will stay for decaies un correct information. becuase its diffical to correct them.
Second, the information in the online can easily change or add by vandals and hackers. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this notion. She cites, the orginal formats are secured and no one can edit or change. therefore this reason is inconvenient.
Finally, the author argues, the online encyclopedias concentrate on popular topics which creat false impression of what important and what not. The lecturer contradictrs this point. She mentions, in traditional books there is a very samll space for information. As a result only few information will written. Furthermore, online encycopedias have a huge knowledege with stronge advantages.
The reading passage and lecture are both discussing the advantages of communal online encyclopedias over traditional one. The writer claims three problems with using online encyclopedias. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She contends, these problems never be perfect.
First, the writer states, the information in traditional books are written by experts people, therefore, they have academic credentials. The online information lake of this credentail, they have many errors. This statement is challenged by professor, She mentions, the errors in the online encyclopedias can easily correct and edit. Moreover, books never closely perfect. Any errors in traditional books will stay for decaies un correct information. because its difficul to correct them.
Second, the information in the online can easily change or add by vandals and hackers. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this notion. She cites, the orginal formats are secured and no one can edit or change. therefore this reason is inconvenient.
Finally, the author argues, the online encyclopedias concentrate on popular topics which creat false impression of what important and what not. The lecturer contradictrs this point. She mentions, in traditional books there is a very small space for information. As a result only few information will written. Furthermore, online encycopedias have a huge knowledege with a strong advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-31 | talelaldabous | 73 | view |
- Spending time with our kids is a paramount factor thal help to build their personalty Whether use that time by have fun playing games or best touse itdoing things togather like doing schoolwork This cab be weighted in many aspects however some parents bel 60
- In our wold there are many celebrities and famous people who have their opnion that may influance others around them The question is whether those celebrities more important for young people than older or not This can be weighed in many aspects Admittedly 76
- The reading passage and the lecture disccuses how to prevent birds from injury by hitting in building made of glass material The writer claims several solution for this problem However the lecturer casts dout on claim made in article He suggests non solut 60
- Working hard is the crucial way for succide so whether working with a group team is better than working alone or not this can be wieged in many aspects In my perceptive I concur with working as a team to success In the followind paraghraph I will elaborat 70
- Suitable Career is a crucial concern of all people in the life Individuals try to find job which give them a best benefit Whether people enjoyable more with three days work with long hours or five days a week for short hours This can be weighed in may asp 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture are both...
^^
Line 2, column 451, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...tay for decaies un correct information. because its difficul to correct them. Secon...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 451, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tay for decaies un correct information. because its difficul to correct them. Secon...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... because its difficul to correct them. Second, the information in the online ca...
^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n in the online can easily change or add by vandals and hackers. The lecturer in ...
^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... secured and no one can edit or change. therefore this reason is inconvenient. Finally,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
... secured and no one can edit or change. therefore this reason is inconvenient. Finally,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... is a very small space for information. As a result only few information will writ...
^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...space for information. As a result only few information will written. Furthermore, ...
^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little information'.
Suggestion: little information
...space for information. As a result only few information will written. Furthermore, online encyc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'write' or 'be written'?
Suggestion: write; be written
.... As a result only few information will written. Furthermore, online encycopedias have ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ias have a huge knowledege with a strong advantages.
^^
Line 4, column 381, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'advantage'?
Suggestion: advantage
...s have a huge knowledege with a strong advantages.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 12.0772626932 8% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62962962963 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01520779585 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5061080966 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.0 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.3684210526 21.698381199 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406778153881 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111898159226 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149256448852 0.0662205650399 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273440891048 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.270365436107 0.0443174109184 610% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.39 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.19 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.