The reading passage and lecture are both talking about carved stone ball which are type of artifact found in Scotland. The writer claims three diffirent using of this stone ball. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions no one of these theriories about using of stone is convincing.
First, the author states, this stone ball was used as a weapons in hunting and fighting. This statement is challenged by professor. She suggests. weapons are used in war. therefore, we should see erosion or damage in these weapons. But this stone ball present in intact state without any damage or broken parts. That indicate., these stone artifacts did not used for fighting or hunting.
Second, the author asserts, stone balls were used as a system of weights measures device , because , they have standerd weights. The professor in the other hand elaborates on different types of stones which balls are made from. Moreover these different material have different density. So, the stone ball have same shapes, with different weights.that why they can not be used as weights measures.
Finally, the passage illustrates on social markers found on these artifacts. This mean that stone balls have special meaning. The lecturer refutes this argument. She points to simple desgin of these balls. Furthermore, we can not find any stone ball baried with the dead people in graves. This illustrates, these stone artifacts do not have any specific meaning to indivitual.
The reading passage and lecture are both talking about carved stone ball which are type of artifact found in Scotland. The writer claims three diffirent using of this stone ball. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions no one of these theriories about using of stone is convincing.
First, the author states, this stone ball was used as a weapons in hunting and fighting. This statement is challenged by professor. She suggests. weapons are used in war. therefore, we should see erosion or damage in these weapons. But this stone ball present in intact state without any damage or broken parts. That indicate., these stone artifacts did not used for fighting or hunting.
Second, the author asserts, stone balls were used as a system of weights measures device , because , they have standed weights. The professor in the other hand elaborates on different types of stones which balls are made from. Moreover these different material have different density. So, the stone ball have same shapes, with different weights.that why they can not be used as weights measures.
Finally, the passage illustrates on social markers found on these artifacts. This mean that stone balls have special meaning. The lecturer refutes this argument. She points to simple degins of these balls. Furthermore, we can not find any stone ball baried with the dead people in graves. This illustrates, these stone artifacts do not have any specific meaning to indivitual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-05 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The reading passage and lecture talk about type of fungus called Phytophthora which detected in forest of USA these fungus infects trees and cause serious damage to oak trees The author claims three methods to protect the forests The lecturer casts doubt 60
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about declination of bird population in United States The writer claims three reasons beyond this declination However the lecturer contradicts these reasons She thinks each reason is mentioned in readin 65
- The reaging passage and lecturer are both discussing invasion of zebra mussel to fresh water The author claims three reasons to believe that this invasion can not be stoped and cause decline in water fish population The le cturer casts doubt on claim made 60
- Teachers are paramount factor in student education process They should their best to teach kids crucial things which are essential for their futur The question is whether teachers shouls share their political thoughts with their students or not This can b 60
- The passage and lecture both discuss genetically modified trees The author claims tree benefits from tree that modified genetically The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article She states it is not obvious there is any benefits from this method o 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture are both...
^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'using' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...land. The writer claims three diffirent using of this stone ball. The lecturer casts ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ree diffirent using of this stone ball. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irst, the author states, this stone ball was used as a weapons in hunting and fig...
^^
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a weapon' or simply 'weapons'?
Suggestion: a weapon; weapons
...or states, this stone ball was used as a weapons in hunting and fighting. This statement...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Weapons
... challenged by professor. She suggests. weapons are used in war. therefore, we should ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... She suggests. weapons are used in war. therefore, we should see erosion or damage in th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sts. weapons are used in war. therefore, we should see erosion or damage in these...
^^
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...ndicate., these stone artifacts did not used for fighting or hunting. Second, th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... did not used for fighting or hunting. Second, the author asserts, stone balls ...
^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d as a system of weights measures device , because , they have standed weights. Th...
^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tem of weights measures device , because , they have standed weights. The professo...
^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...es of stones which balls are made from. Moreover these different material have different...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12916666667 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47806096545 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 3.25607064018 430% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4658417098 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.55 110.228320801 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.0 21.698381199 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.578528310853 0.272083759551 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167691578481 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143735499821 0.0662205650399 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.392605215441 0.162205337803 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.294567527946 0.0443174109184 665% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.3589403974 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.