The reading passage and the lecture talk about type of sound called quakers that heard by submarines in Russia in 1960. The writer claims several theories to explain the sources of this sound. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, quackers is a strange phenomnen, and all theories which are mention in passage are not convincing.
To begin with, the author states, the sound occur by ocra whale. Ocra male use this sound to call femal ocra during a countership ritual. This statement is contradictes by professor. She illustrates, ocra live in surface of ocean. And submarines presented sound in deep ocean. Therefore, the idea that ocra made this sound is unlikely.
Second, the writer says, the sound were caused by gaint squids. sonar can not detect them since their body are made from soft tissue that this devce can not detect them. The professor refutes this notion. She elaborates, submarines heard this sound in 1960, but, thid sound disapper in 1980. Moreover, if squids cause this sound, whey they stop doing it and them return back to do it. As a result, this evidence is also not true.
Finally, the author asserts, this sound is from military technology. Submarine secretly patroling the area. The professor rebuts this point. She says, submarines move around and change their driction very fast. this can not be happened with military marines since, they can not move fast. son this explanation in passage also incorrect.
The reading passage and the lecture talk about type of sound called quakers that heard by submarines in Russia in 1960. The writer claims several theories to explain the sources of this sound. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, quackers is a strange phenomnen, and all theories which are mention in passage are not convincing.
To begin with, the author states, the sound occur by ocra whale. Ocra male use this sound to call femal ocra during a countership ritual. This statement is contradictes by professor. She illustrates, ocra live in surface of ocean. And submarines presented sound in deep ocean. Therefore, the idea that ocra made this sound is unlikely.
Second, the writer says, the sound were caused by gaint squids. sonar can not detect them since their body are made from soft tissue that this devce can not detect them. The professor refutes this notion. She elaborates, submarines heard this sound in 1960, but, thid sound disapper in 1980. Moreover, if squids cause this sound, whey they stop doing it and them return back to do it. As a result, this evidence is also not true.
Finally, the author asserts, this sound is from military technology. Submarine secretly patroling the area. The professor rebuts this point. She says, submarines move around and change their deriction very fast. this can not be happened with military marines since, they can not move fast. son this explanation in passage also incorrect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-16 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- Human beings normaly may accidently do some mistake in life teachers or our managers are human beings therefore may fell in fualt during doing their job The important thing is how we behave when we face like this issue Admittedly some people prefer to say 60
- The reading and lecture about the old fossil of Tyrannosaurus The writer claims these fossils still contain remains of actul tissues lije blood vessels red blood cells and collagen matrix he elaborates three evidences T he lecturer casts doubt on claim ma 70
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about computerize smart cars The writer claims several benefits by using this type of cars However the professor casts doubt on claim made in article She believes using computerize cars is not clear ben 78
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about computerize smart cars The writer claims several benefits by using this type of cars However the professor casts doubt on claim made in article She believes using computerize cars is not clear ben 78
- The passage and lecture both disccus migration of edmontosaur in winter from arctic slope to south The writer claims three arguments to support this migration The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions migration of ed 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the lecture talk...
^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s to explain the sources of this sound. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sonar
... the sound were caused by gaint squids. sonar can not detect them since their body ar...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...sound, whey they stop doing it and them return back to do it. As a result, this evidence is...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d and change their deriction very fast. this can not be happened with military marin...
^^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Son
... marines since, they can not move fast. son this explanation in passage also incorr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98775510204 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38761206619 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587755102041 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4534048399 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 55.5454545455 110.228320801 50% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.1363636364 21.698381199 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 18.0 4.27373068433 421% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483074217544 0.272083759551 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135140324337 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146863265826 0.0662205650399 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322548164156 0.162205337803 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.278874285003 0.0443174109184 629% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.3589403974 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.48 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.