Reduce in birds population due to the cities development and using pesticides
The passage calimed that, these days the population of birds are reducing. The reading mentioned some reasons to support its point of view. The lecture, on the contrary, cast doubt on the ideas writen in the text by some explanation and counterclaim to refute all of the reasons in the article.
First of all, the author argued that the growth of population causes the elemination of birds natural habitat, however, the professor at reject this reasons and said that this reducing is not uniformly and some types of birds population are increasing which even pry on the other types.
Second, The reading highlighted the thought that growing in agrucultral activities in response of population growth, resulted in more land being under cultivation. Therefore the birds have less land to inhibite. However, the professor in her lecture disagree with idea. She said that nowadays, the development in agricultural industries lead to rise more productive crops which required less farm land. in other words the ratio of produced crops per cultivated land decreased. Thus, the less land occupied for farming purposes and birds natural habitat will be preserved.
Finally, The passage bring up the idea that using pesticides will be very harmful for birds health conditions and even if it did not directly responsible for their death, it would reducing their reproducing ability. In contrast the speaker denied this opinion by providing two reasons. First, these days, the used pesticides consist of less harmfull chemical component than the traditional pesticides used in past. Second, farmers produce pets resistance crops which eleminate the need of use chemical products against insects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e reasons to support its point of view. The lecture, on the contrary, cast doubt on...
^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... explanation and counterclaim to refute all of the reasons in the article. First of a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...d in more land being under cultivation. Therefore the birds have less land to inhibite. H...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 404, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ve crops which required less farm land. in other words the ratio of produced crops...
^^
Line 13, column 181, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...y responsible for their death, it would reducing their reproducing ability. In contrast ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 220, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... reducing their reproducing ability. In contrast the speaker denied this opinion by prov...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 407, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...nt than the traditional pesticides used in past. Second, farmers produce pets resistanc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, first of all, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3670411985 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67603454918 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4018972452 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.357142857 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244825314434 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673927942709 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684606414512 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133601302073 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625551798687 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.