Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and

Although both the reading and listening passage deal with the same topic :the doubt whether Rembrandt was the true artist of his paintings or not, their pperspective are different. While the author of the reading believes that Remdant is not the one who create the paintings, the lecturer casts doubt ont he writer's idea. He claims that Remdant is a great artist by painting his masterpieces.

The first point made in the reading is that there is something inconsistent about the woman's clothes in the portrait. The article notes that the woman could not afford a luxurious fur coat because of her condition as a servant. On the other hand, the lecturer contradicts the writer's idea by asserting that there is no illogical in this fur collar. Moreover, he argues that this paintings was painted one hundred years after the creation of the painting. Therefore, letting the woman wear luxurious fur coat makes her look like a fomal lady.

Another point that the reading emphasizes is the light and shadow in the paintings. It is mentioned that the face of the woman is illuminated by light, and below the face is dark fur collar. However, the lecturer refutes this argument and claims that the original painting looks realistic with Rembrandt's usage of simple color and light for face.

The last point made in the reading is that the back of the painting was made by glued wood panel which could not happen at that time. The article established that although Rembrandt painted on wood panel, there is no record about his paintings on pannel guled together.On the contrary, the lecturer claims that the wood panel in Rembrandt's painting is reasonanle. He puts forth the idea by a research which found that Rembrandt's paintingwere created on same piece of trees. Besides, gluing wood panel together not only enlarged the paintings but also made it more valuable.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ther hand, the lecturer contradicts the writers idea by asserting that there is no illo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...is fur collar. Moreover, he argues that this paintings was painted one hundred years...
^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nting. Therefore, letting the woman wear luxurious fur coat makes her look like ...
^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tting the woman wear luxurious fur coat makes her look like a fomal lady. Ano...
^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
... his paintings on pannel guled together.On the contrary, the lecturer claims that ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93650793651 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52626216057 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501587301587 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2918425235 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229757517182 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727947244225 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749047328031 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134218420258 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521876768729 0.0443174109184 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.