Although both the reading passage and listening passage deal with the same topic: teamwork, their perspective are different. While the author of the reading passage believes that team working has advantages to both the team and the members, the lecturer casts doubt on the writer’s idea. He thinks that teamwork is not beneficial as it may seem.
The first point made in the reading passage is that the team completes its work at fast rate. It is mentioned that there are wide range of knowledge, expertise, and skills in a team. Therefore, creative solutions to a problem or issues can be created in a minute. On the other hand, the lecturer contradicts the writer’s idea by asserting that teamwork slowdown the progress. He argues that the team must have many meetings and debates to reach to agreement in their work which waste a considerable amount of time.
Another point made in the reading passage is that member in a team is rewarded. The article notes that they feel more important in a team by creating a good idea leading to success. However, the lecturer refutes this argument and claims that the success is recognized by the whole team not a member in the team. Therefore, the real contributor cannot have the deserved rewarding.
The last point that the author made in the passage is that the success of the teamwork has far reaching and impact, as the whole team made effort to that work together. On the contrary, the lecturer claims that all the member of the team are responsible for their work. He puts forth his idea that if the work is failed, all member must take their account to what they have done that leads to the wrong decisions.
- Some people prefer to take a position in a company and work for the company. Other people think it is better to go into business for themselves. Which do you think it is better? Give reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TOEFL essay: Why go to university? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76975945017 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5298585377 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487972508591 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2184687586 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5333333333 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247517065293 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919495058479 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562685604994 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16488573515 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564464345109 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.