Robert E. Peary journey to the North Pole
The reading passage and the lecture both are about Robert E. Peary journey to the North Pole. The reading passage provides three reasons to support Robert E. Peary. The lecture casts doubt on the claim made in the passage.
Firstly, the reading passage points out that the National Geographic Society concluded that Peary’s accounts were consistent and persuasive and declared that he had indeed reached the North Pole. This point is challenged by the lecturer. The lecturer states that the committee was composed by the Peary’s close friends with a huge numbers of money. Therefore, the committee is not trustworthy. Secondly, the passage points out that a recent expedition provides support for Peary’s claim that he reached the North Pole in only 37 days because a British explorer named Tom Avery recently made the same trek in less than 37 days. The lecturer insists that Tom Avery’s journey was too different from Peary’s because tom went to the North Pole in favorable conditions whereas Peary went to the North Pole in very unfavorable conditions.
Next, the reading passage elaborates that the photograph that was taken by Peary. Furthermore, the passage states that measuring the shadows in Peary’s photographs makes it possible to calculate the Sun’s position in the sky and provides evidence that he reached to the North Pole. The lecturer argues that Peary’s pictures were photographed a hundred years ago and the photos have become faded. Therefore, it cannot be accurate to measure the shadow of the sun.
In conclusion, the reading and the lecture both are about Robert E. Peary journey to the North Pole. The professor effectively refutes the claims made in the article.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | Ashfaq | 90 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | aliola_214 | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | bishoy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Seema Modak | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | alta | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the lecture both...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ree reasons to support Robert E. Peary. The lecture casts doubt on the claim made i...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubt on the claim made in the passage. Firstly, the reading passage points out ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Pole in very unfavorable conditions. Next, the reading passage elaborates tha...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate to measure the shadow of the sun. In conclusion, the reading and the lectu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25631768953 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74990743536 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494584837545 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.0436456715 49.2860985944 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6470588235 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418262416357 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171265786802 0.0996497079465 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.252823161181 0.0662205650399 382% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308101047089 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111770589155 0.0443174109184 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.