Smart cars
The reading and lecture both discuss about smart cars which are controlled by advanced technology. The writer provides three theories to encourage people to use smart cars. However, the professor casts doubt on the three theories with many reasons.
In the first theory mentioned in the reading, smart cars will positively reduce the quantity of accidents happening during last few decades. This results from the fact that smart cars are equipped with adequate technology which help them exactly detect cars and other barriers in their route. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this theory. She argues that the high technology still possibly makes some mistakes. If the mistake happens to some cars at the same time, the accident may even be worse than the accident made by people.
Regarding to the second theory stated in the reading, the wide use of smart cars will solve traffic problems. For example, cars driven by intelligent computer will always run at the high speed so it will reduce the total of time travel of cars on the road. On the other hand, the lecturer disagrees with this theory. She points out that if people start to use smart cars, the quantity of cars on the road will increase dramatically. She means that if the road is too crowded, the car owners will not take any advantages of high technology because the cars have to run at low speed.
Finally, the author suggests that smart cars will help the owner save money because they do not need to maintain expensive items such as brakes, tires usually. The lecturer again refutes this theory by arguing that smart cars require smart computer systems to operate efficiently. The professor concludes that the money used to pay for the maintenance of the advanced technology is much higher than mechanical items.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-17 | Julie.Zhu | 85 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | villian7 | 75 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, still, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96333333333 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39429646359 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6765748561 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0625 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486997588536 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170242841224 0.0996497079465 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136276045126 0.0662205650399 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325435841494 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368887399786 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.