Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends

Essay topics:

Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.

Nowadays, children spend almost of their time in school where they could learn a lot of knowledge from their teacher and their peers. Most people insist that students are easier affected by their teachers than by their friends. Personally, I totally disagree with this statement for the following reasons.
To begin with, most students just meet their teachers only in class; however, they meet their friends not only in school hours but also after their school time. Specifically, because of spending a lot of time together, they could easily share their stories and interests to make their relationships become more stiffened. Especially with the emerging of technology, students have many communications platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and so on. to talk with their friends. Because the time with their friend is larger than the time with their teachers, there are more chance for students to be influenced by their friends.
Secondly, some opponents may argue that teachers are the most likely to be the first person who students can share their problems with; therefore, they will be more easily influenced by their teachers. However, the reality could be different. In fact, because of a big generation gap between the students and the teachers, students may feel a little bit hesitant to have a talk with their teacher. Instead, they may share with their friends who have already experienced this kind of problem before to find a solution. Thus, because of dealing with the problem together, students are easily affected by their peers.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that students are more influenced by their friends than by their teachers. This is because students often spend time together and they may comfortably share their problem with their friend.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-14 Astha101 60 view
2023-05-18 fanassertive 71 view
2023-05-18 weiwei 70 view
2023-05-04 Yam Kumar Oli 60 view
2023-04-21 rahmi88 60 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...s and the teachers, students may feel a little bit hesitant to have a talk with their teac...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 287.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20209059233 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55891500214 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477351916376 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8878107681 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5333333333 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.586883593239 0.236089414692 249% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255833764136 0.076458572812 335% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178360352695 0.0737576698707 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.46628101319 0.150856017488 309% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903479405223 0.0645574589148 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...s and the teachers, students may feel a little bit hesitant to have a talk with their teac...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 287.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20209059233 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55891500214 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477351916376 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8878107681 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5333333333 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.586883593239 0.236089414692 249% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255833764136 0.076458572812 335% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178360352695 0.0737576698707 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.46628101319 0.150856017488 309% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903479405223 0.0645574589148 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.