Soon technology will provide smart cars that virtually drives themselves. A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination. The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and other technologies that w

Both the passage and the lecture talk about the smart cars that will be driven by computers. The two contradictory views about the positive or negative ramifications of having smart cars are presented. The passage highlights the three major benefits stating that it will be safer, quicker and cheaper whereas the lecturer casts doubt on this by giving three reasons.

To begin with, technologically advanced devices fail occasionally. The cars are packed and tightly run with many cars piled up which leads to the worst accidents. However, this challenges the idea in the passage that smart cars will prevent accidents as it is controlled by the computers which are less likely to make mistakes than humans. In addition, these cars will be equipped with sensors and automatic programs that work effectively to avoid accidents.

Secondly, when convenience of driving is augmented, more people will be using smart cars which will add more traffic instead of solving traffic problems as stated by the passage. In such case, it will add no advantage to the people who commute by car and clearly contradicts the idea in the passage that increase in speed will lead to greater advantages for people commuting by car.

Furthermore, as smart cars use higher technologies like sensor, they will be more expensive. Moreover, their repairs will also be costly due to the advanced equipment used. Again, this refutes what is presented in the passage that car owners will have to repair them less often as these cars drive the most direct routes and the expensive items like brakes will last longer.

All in all, the chances of worst accidents, the addition of more traffic and increased costs are the major reasons presented for not considering the smart cars as cars providing more advantages in future.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the worst'.
Suggestion: of the worst
...last longer. All in all, the chances of worst accidents, the addition of more traffic...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 195, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... cars as cars providing more advantages in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs providing more advantages in future.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09764309764 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61234766561 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8390308301 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.461538462 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291988473394 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113933896856 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424234521402 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1651153496 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468359336736 0.0443174109184 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.