Spartacus, the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves, is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history. Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several battles. Eventually Spartacus and his army were defeated and put to death. To this day, Spartacus fascinates both historians and the general public. Several aspects about his story have made him a particularly appealing hero.
First, Spartacus’ original goal in his conflict against Rome is one everyone can empathize with—he wanted to return home. Spartacus and his men had been taken by the Romans from faraway lands. In fighting the Romans, Spartacus and his men initially sought to return to the homelands from which they had been uprooted. Spartacus and his men’s desire to return home is one we can all appreciate.
Second, Spartacus’ initial success in fighting against the powerful Roman army has earned him the admiration people feel when someone who is overmatched triumphs through sheer skill. Spartacus and his men formed a relatively small, ill-equipped army; the Roman army, in contrast, was large, well-financed, and highly trained. Spartacus’ ability to seriously trouble the Romans on the battlefield testifies to his military brilliance, making him a hero in most people’s eyes.
Third, in fighting against Rome, Spartacus sought to liberate all Roman slaves and thus commanded respect as an early human rights advocate. Before his final battle with the Romans, Spartacus was sent an offer by a Roman general: if Spartacus would stop fighting, he would be made a Roman senator, a member of Rome’s powerful elite, and his men would be freed. However, Spartacus rejected this offer because it would have left the institution of slavery in place.
Both the lecture and reading passage are discussing Spartacus, the rebel leader who fought against Romans. The former is of the opinion that he is not a hero rather just an inspirational play hero. While the latter provides three reasons in support of it.
To begin with, the first issue we encounter is associated with his urge to go back home with his fellows. The professor highlights that it's not accurate that he wanted to get back home because when he was released from the Romans and had the opportunity to return home, he didn't utilize it rather travel further more towards them to take the revenge. On the other hand, the text posits that he has a strong will to return home.
Moreover, another topic of the debate revolves around his sheer skills. The speaker points out that he initially won against the Romans because they didn't take him seriously. Furthermore, they allocated weak soldiers and when their trained army was there he got defeated. However, the author mentions that Sparcatus had very fine fighting skills and strategies.
Thirdly, the final point of discussion is connected with liberation of all slaves. The lecture claims that in the 18th century people widely followed slavery. They wanted to have some anti-slavery hero, so Spartacus is just an inspirational play character instead of some heroic character. Nevertheless, the passage states that he was a powerful slave liberation figure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-26 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | ShuEyy | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | nusybah | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 66
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 80
- The cane toad is a large 1 8kg amphibian species native to Central and South America It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers crops by eating harmful insects Unfortunately the toad multiplied r 81
- Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rather just an inspirational play hero. While the latter provides three reasons in su...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... had the opportunity to return home, he didnt utilize it rather travel further more t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'travels'?
Suggestion: travels
...return home, he didnt utilize it rather travel further more towards them to take the r...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 150, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...lly won against the Romans because they didnt take him seriously. Furthermore, they a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, third, thirdly, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07203389831 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58663101572 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648305084746 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5499361512 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168226585641 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048157377656 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055729844081 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947778575615 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309209346196 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rather just an inspirational play hero. While the latter provides three reasons in su...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... had the opportunity to return home, he didnt utilize it rather travel further more t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'travels'?
Suggestion: travels
...return home, he didnt utilize it rather travel further more towards them to take the r...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 150, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...lly won against the Romans because they didnt take him seriously. Furthermore, they a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, third, thirdly, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07203389831 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58663101572 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648305084746 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5499361512 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168226585641 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048157377656 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055729844081 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947778575615 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309209346196 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.