Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The article states that rare and important fossils are sold to private ownership for millions of dollars and this is not good for both scientists and the general public and provides three resons for support. However, the professor explains that benefit i smore than the disadvantage to the public and scientist and refute each of the author's reasons.
First, The public won't get chance to see fossils as they were sold to private collectors. The professor refutes these points. he says that even low level public can see fossils.
Second, the reading states that scientists won't get access to the most important fossils. The professor this is not realistic idea. He explains that scientist are the people who will identify the value of the fosssils by doing detail examination and doing test. Before it goes to private collector it has to pass from the scientist so they won't loss and important information regarding fossils.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | dentista1985 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jiyakavya | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | dentista1985 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | jiyakavya | 3 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | jiyakavya | 3 | view |
- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-5 independent essay 3
- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO 15 integrated essay 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...is not good for both scientists and the general public and provides three resons for support. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...rs. The professor refutes these points. he says that even low level public can see...
^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that scientists wont get access to the most important fossils. The professor th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 1373.03311258 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 154.0 270.72406181 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07792207792 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49675113573 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 145.348785872 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 419.366225166 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1011148194 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8888888889 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0427223617734 0.272083759551 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0180648630386 0.0996497079465 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0162974859995 0.0662205650399 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0286083653194 0.162205337803 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133881405211 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 63.6247240618 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.