TPO- 16
The article declares that in the twentieth-century archaeologists suffer serious problems and limitations to find a history of human settlement in Britain and provides three reasons for that. However, the professor explains that in 1990 Britain adopted new rules which helped in all three areas which article discusses and refutes each of the author's reasons.
To begin with, the reading states that due to construction many important artifacts were destroyed. On the other hand, the lecturer contradicts this points by stating that according to new guideline before construction start site has to examine first by the archaeologists and if is valuable for them then they have to find other options like they can do construction around that area or archaeologists have to excavate the whole site first and after that construction start.
Moreover, the reading claims that the government not providing enough financial support for archaeological research. Nonetheless, the speaker says that if they find valuable artifacts site then the construction company had to pay for an initial examination so there is more financial support than before.
Lastly, the passage contends that to have a career in archaeology is very difficult. The professor cast doubt on this theory. He points out that the government hire paid archaeologists to do work. And many of them needed different stages during the excavating process like draw proper plans, process all collected data, etc. So many jobs are generated and many opportunities available for archaeologists.
- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Grades encourage students to work harder at school. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 75
- TPO 17 integrated essay 75
- In general, people are living longer now. Which of the following do you think accounts for this phenomenon?Technological improvementsChanges to education systemsImprovements to our dietsUse specific details and examples in your answer. You may choose more 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, as to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48962655602 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08960660595 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597510373444 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.8763218045 49.2860985944 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.272727273 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307901988858 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106917364364 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616253088842 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166075214865 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343860206565 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.