summarize the points made in the lecture
Spartacus is a famous figures in ancient Roman history. The reading passage states three aspects of Spartacus' story thatfascinate both historians and the general public. However, the professor provides arguments to point out the inaccuracies in thereading passage.
First, the reading passage states that the goal of Spartacus and his men to fight the Romans is because they wanted to gohome. This is something everyone can empathize with. However, the professor says returning home wasn't their only goal. Theevidence is that when Spartacus first defeated the Roman army, he didn't take that opportunity to escape. Instead, he and hismen marched toward the city of Rome. This implies that they wanted to capture the city and its wealth.
Second, the reading passage claims that Spartacus has military skills to lead an inferior army to defeat the well-trained Romanforces, and this earned him the admiration. However, the professor says that Spartacus won the first few battles not because ofhis military skill but because Romans did not take him seriously at first. Romans initially sent only the poorly-trained soldiers andthat was defeated by Spartacus. Later, when Romans sent their best army, Spartacus was quickly defeated.
Lastly, the reading passage states that Spartacus turned down the offer of a Roman senator position. His action earned himthe reputation as a human rights advocate because Spartacus wanted to liberate Roman slaves. However, the professor pointsout that this story was made up by eighteenth century European playwright who was a member of the antislavery movement.People in the movement needed to have an inspirational hero from ancient time, so Spartacus was portrayed as such a hero. Inother words, it was just an inspirational play not the historical fact.
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures andother information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create suchrecords Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to suppor 27
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge specific theories presented in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'figure'?
Suggestion: figure
Spartacus is a famous figures in ancient Roman history. The reading p...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...y thatfascinate both historians and the general public. However, the professor provides argume...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ever, the professor says returning home wasnt their only goal. Theevidence is that wh...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...tacus first defeated the Roman army, he didnt take that opportunity to escape. Instea...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: People
...as a member of the antislavery movement.People in the movement needed to have an inspi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, lastly, second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76707131702 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567857142857 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4563819865 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9411764706 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64705882353 7.06452816374 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.024694784542 0.272083759551 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00789210787574 0.0996497079465 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233309169174 0.0662205650399 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0196118951945 0.162205337803 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212075037518 0.0443174109184 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.