summarize the points made in the lecture about problems with possible theories made for animals sudden elimination explanation, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading about animals sudden extinction.
The reading discusses the possibilities that can be a logical explanation for sudden elimination of various animal species in a limited time frame. However, the professor, in the lecture, totally disagrees with these theories and thinks that they can not be satisfying reasons for these phenomena. She gives three reasons to oppose the assumptions mentioned in the writing.
First, the article states that sea levels' reduction may be a possible cause for different animals extinction. But, the professor reminds that the animals that lived in these habitats had the capability to adapt themselves to gradual sea level fluctuations. So, there would be an extinction just if these sea level changes happened abruptly which we know they were not. Therefore, this theory can not be a good explanation for animals' extinction.
Second, the passage indicates that sudden climate cooling is another main factor that can lead to an expanded extinction. In contrary, professor reminds that sulfur dioxide which is attributed as the main cooling reason is still present in the atmosphere. Also, she mentions that this chemical compound would not stay in the air for much long time, since it might react with water and come down to soil in the form of rain eventually. Thus, its concentration was not in a noticble quantity that can affect the life of many creatures.
Third, the reading talks about the possibility of an astroid hit as a theory that could end the life of animals in that period. On the other hand, she believes that this idea is problematic, as there is not any evidance about any astroid that hit the earth in that time. Although scientists found some carter samples but these samples analysis showed that they are for 12 million years ago so much before the time that this extinction even began to occur.
- After they complete their university studies some students live in their home towns others live in different towns or cities Which do you think is better living in your hometown or living in different towns or cities 89
- summarize the points made in the lecture about problems with living in asteroids, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading about benefits of living in an asteroid. 80
- It has recently been announced that a new movie theater may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? 76
- It’s better to make wrong decision than make no decision at all.” Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Give reasons or specific examples to illustrate your answer. 70
- Some people think that parents should plan their children’s leisure time carefully. Other people believe? Those children should decide for themselves how to spend their free time, which idea do you agree with? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...e theories and thinks that they can not be satisfying reasons for these phenomena. She gives ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'levels'' or 'level's'?
Suggestion: levels'; level's
... First, the article states that sea levels reduction may be a possible cause for d...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...n may be a possible cause for different animals extinction. But, the professor reminds ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, third, thus, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03300330033 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64124981597 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577557755776 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7297259711 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.928571429 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21619935524 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769249531643 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679559556115 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129309799619 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543997104736 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.