Summarize the points made in the lecture, be in sure in how the professor casts doubt on specific ideas made in the reading passage?
The text and the lecture provides two opposing views about why sea otter population declined along the Alaskan coast. While the passage states that there was possible explanation about how the sea otter declined, the professor casts doubt on those ideas of the reading and states that sea otters have been declined due to predation.
First, the professor challenges the idea of pollution as a cause to declined sea otter. He states that there is no evidence to find dead sea otters which were declined by pollution. Although the passage brings water samples from the area revealed increased level of chemicals as a sign that decrease the sea otters, the professor states that hypothesis of predators rings true because predators eat the sea otters, therefore, their dead cannot be found.
Second, according to the reading other sea mammals are also declining, indicating that whatever had endangered sea otters was effecting other sea mammals also. Nevertheless, the professor questions this, arguing whales become dis appeared because of human hunters. Also, the professor mentioned the whales become hunted, the process cause also the decline of other small species.
Finally, the professor rebuts the idea of population hypothesis. He states that sea otter may be declined because of their location not population. Though the reading brings at some Alaskan location population declined more than other places, the professor mentioned that orgrese cause the declined of otters. He mentioned that ogres are long enough and lives at shallow water that cause decline of otters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-07 | sattarhassanyar | 81 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture be in sure in how the professor casts doubt on specific ideas made in the reading passage 81
- Some people think playing computer games are a waste of time for children Do you agree or disagree with the statement Use specific details and examples to support your opinion 66
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 63
- summarize the point made in the lecture make sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The text and the lecture provides two op...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s have been declined due to predation. First, the professor challenges the idea...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...therefore, their dead cannot be found. Second, according to the reading other s...
^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... otters was effecting other sea mammals also. Nevertheless, the professor questions ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so the decline of other small species. Finally, the professor rebuts the idea o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.328 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49807605969 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3621357465 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128280051797 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557534286473 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498781475029 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870640374537 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399656511485 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.