Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the passage and the lecturer discuss the asteroids and the possibility of colonization them. The article mentions varieties of reasons to support the idea of the possibility living there, on the other hand, the professor points out some persuasive ideas that decline the reasons.
Firstly, according to the passage, because asteroids have lower gravity due to their small size than other planets, then spaceships landing and departing is safer, and they can carry some equipment to colony's use and less fuel needs. Conversely, the lecturer dismisses the reason, she believes that the low gravity of astroids cause some health problems for people like, like decreasing bone density and muscle mass, especially for a long time. so it cannot be practical.
Second, the author of the writing is of the opinion that astroids are rich of some valuable elements, such as metal like gold and platinum, which the colonies can transport them to the Earth for selling and earning money. However, the speaker refutes this belief with the reason that these valuable metals are heavy to transporting, so it is not economical, and increasing the amount of these kinds of metals during the time the price and value of the decline, in this way it cannot be beneficial.
At last, the reading points the astroids' distance from Earth in comparison of Mars and Moon, this means the traveling to Earth is very easy and affordable. On the other hand, the lecturer stands on the opposite side, and she is of the opinion that, these astroids usually move on their orbit, so this means that some times they moves far away, even as Moon's distance fromthe Earth, then it cause some problem to travel the colonies, as a result it is not a persuasive idea.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-31 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 80 | view |
2023-08-30 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 73 | view |
2023-03-13 | saharmnd | 80 | view |
2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 80 | view |
2022-10-12 | jjj33333 | 52 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Summarize the points 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure how they respond to specifics presented in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...uscle mass, especially for a long time. so it cannot be practical. Second, the ...
^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as metal 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...f some valuable elements, such as metal like gold and platinum, which the colonies c...
^^^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'move'
Suggestion: move
...bit, so this means that some times they moves far away, even as Moons distance fromth...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 391, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...s Moons distance fromthe Earth, then it cause some problem to travel the colonies, as...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, however, second, so, then, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92176870748 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48179311228 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56462585034 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.8907284567 49.2860985944 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.777777778 110.228320801 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 21.698381199 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910851803966 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437113184075 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295749816977 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564608870351 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296913503337 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.