Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading passage and the lecturer discuss the requirement of paying taxes by smokers and the effect of that for smoker people. The passage points out some social benefits of this policy, On the other hand the professor refutes them.
Firstly, the author contended that by increasing the taxes of cigarettes, the government can discourage citizens to use it. However, the speaker challenged the idea. She believes that this policy cannot aid smokers to reduce buying this product, conversely, when cigarettes become expensive due to adding more taxes, then they encourage to purchase cheaper ones with less quality and dangerous substances, so it will be a risk for them, furthermore, adding the high taxes on this product or unhealthy foods can have a negative effect, means people try to continue buying, so it cannot be practical.
Second, based on the article, it points out that increasing the taxes of cigarettes is fair because it can become an income for the government so they can cover medical costs for other people. In contrast, the professor dismisses this belief because she is of the opinion that, some people who use cigarettes are not in a good financial situation so it is not fair to receive taxes in equal amounts from all citizens who eat unhealthy food or smoke.
At last, the passage mentions that, the revenue of the government by the high rate of taxation can allocate for some construction projects to provide public places for citizens to benefit from. Conversely, the speaker argues that it has terrible effect on the government's behavior because maybe due to reaching more taxes for building public places, they make the public areas free for smokers which is so dangerous.Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | saharmnd | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | jjj33333 | 52 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure how they respond to specifics presented in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Summarize the points 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'purchasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: purchasing
... adding more taxes, then they encourage to purchase cheaper ones with less quality and dang...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...gues that it has terrible effect on the governments behavior because maybe due to reaching ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 417, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Summarize
... free for smokers which is so dangerous.Summarize the points made in the lecture, being s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04575163399 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66910851932 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 21.2450331126 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.8414922 49.2860985944 239% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.555555556 110.228320801 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 21.698381199 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8888888889 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237078528658 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930078734565 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125005981252 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145354900532 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118165860192 0.0443174109184 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.3589403974 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.0289183223 151% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.498013245 149% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.