Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.

The reading and lecture are both about the appearance of famous novelist Jane Austen. The author of the reading states that the sketch of adult Austen by professional artist although does not include her name however there are some evidence that proves the painting to be of Austen. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions that the details of painting are hardly convincing to prove the paintinmg is of Austen and attacks each of the claim made in the article.
Firstly, the author begins by stating that her parents grant permission to use her picture as an illiustration in her letter after her demise. Similarly, now her family member claims that the girl in the portrait is Austen. The professor believes there are flaws in th writer’s position. He contends that Austen was dead almost 70 years ago so the one who is likely to claim the portrait have never seen Austen in real life. Thus, this claims does not seem to be convincing.
Secondly, according to the reading the girl resemble the Austen in many aspects such as her eyebrows, mouth, shape of face and so on. This provide the evidence of drawing to be of her. The speaker on other hand points out that the Austen family was huge. Furthermore, she had many cousion and niece therefore the one who is portrayed in painting might be her niece who is identical to Austen.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that eventhough the exact date of painting is not mentioned the portrait is suceptible to be sketched when the Austen was a teen girl. In addition, the style that links to painter is a kind that is affordable to the affluent family like Austen. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that the stamp on th black canvas shows exactly the same feature of another artist. Most importantly, he initiated painting when Austen was in her late 20’s. Hence, the girl in the painting is surely not of her.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on the appearance of Austen. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-14 Astha101 3 view
2023-07-14 Astha101 3 view
2023-07-14 Astha101 3 view
2023-05-16 hapsh 3 view
2023-05-03 prakriti malla 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user prakriti malla :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...at proves the painting to be of Austen. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions that th...
^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'proving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: proving
...tails of painting are hardly convincing to prove the paintinmg is of Austen and attacks ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f painting is not mentioned the portrait is suceptible to be sketched when the Au...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78813559322 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51190310057 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3993803227 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7142857143 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0945210818627 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331354980006 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331869456823 0.0662205650399 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562987319097 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352285314128 0.0443174109184 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...at proves the painting to be of Austen. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions that th...
^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'proving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: proving
...tails of painting are hardly convincing to prove the paintinmg is of Austen and attacks ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f painting is not mentioned the portrait is suceptible to be sketched when the Au...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78813559322 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51190310057 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3993803227 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7142857143 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0945210818627 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331354980006 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331869456823 0.0662205650399 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562987319097 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352285314128 0.0443174109184 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.