Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about the appearance of Jane Austen. The author of the reading states that there are not many instances of how she looked like, the non professional sketch by her sister cassandra is thought to be her painting and later on painted by other professional artist is in existence. The lecturer disagrees. He mention the painting doesnot resemble her by any chance and attacks each of the claim made in the article.
Firstly, the author of the reading begins by stating that several years after Austen demise her family had given her portrait as an illustration in an edition of her letter. Therefore, they recognized the painting as the portrait of the author and claim it. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends that she was dead almost 70 years ago the authorizes date so the family who claimed the painting did not have seen Austen in real life.
Secondly, according to the writing the girl in the portrait is identical to Austen which means the attributes of girl in the painting is exactly matches with Austen like her nose, mouth, shape of body and so on. The speaker on other hand points out that although they are similar to some extent this might be bacause Austen had large family so the painting is suceptible to resemble one of her niece not Austen herself.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that even though the painting date is obscure the painting style linked with the artist could be afforded by merely affluent family like Austen. Furthermore, the artist was active in painting during the period when Austen was a teenage girl. The professor rebuts this argument. Her puts forth the idea that the stamp on the back of black canvas clearly depicts the syle of another artist. Moreover, he used to sketch in the period when Austen was in her late 20’s. Thus, this proves the painting of a teenage girl does not resemble Austen in any way.
As we can see, the author and lecturer shows conflicting views on the Austen appearance. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 85
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generation Do you agree or disagree Use specific answers or examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement Children should be required to help with household tasks as soon as they are able to do so 76
- Playing computer is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sional sketch by her sister cassandra is thought to be her painting and later on ...
^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...er professional artist is in existence. The lecturer disagrees. He mention the pain...
^^^
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...n existence. The lecturer disagrees. He mention the painting doesnot resemble her by an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 359.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81894150418 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43656653511 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504178272981 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1317795069 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934028009782 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326052370507 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037223935248 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0555404491071 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394731505466 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.