Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt/ supports on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the decision making behavior that can be observed in teen aged people and adult one. The author and lecturer states that teenager are susceptible to make rash decisions owing to the various factors such as differences in brain function and it's causes are mentioned below.
First, the author of the reading states that they are rather influenced by amaeteur behavior than that of their logic and reasoning. For instance, undeveloped caliber includes delayed gratification, emotion regulation and so on. The lecturer further elaborates this by mentioning that these activities are less likely to be appeared in adult since they are matured enough to make wise decision.
Secondly, according to the writing teenagers are competent decision makers and are impacted by psycho-social factors. In addition, they are highly affected by their peer pressure which compelled them to take risky decision. The speaker corroborates this by pointing out that adults do not show such traits of influencing by their companions. Furthermore, they are less likely to pushed in pressing situation by peers.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that risk taking behaviour results as a interaction of socio-emotional and cognitive control network. In addition, socio-emotional network tend to change frequently than cognitive control due to which teenager challenges to regulate risk prone socio-emotional network as they play an imperative role in brain processing emotional and social stimuli for reward processing. The speaker goes on to say that these network are not well developed in teenagers as compared to young adults. Thus, there is a high state of arousal for reward in teenager which subsequently make them viable to approach risk taking decision.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds similar views on risk taking behavior in adult and adolescent. The speaker effectively illustrates the writer's ideas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-30 | prakriti malla | 80 | view |
- It is better to have lots of friends than it is to have just a few friends Do you agree or disagree 60
- You are planning to study abroad What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience Use specific answers and details to support your answer 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 78
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s that risk taking behaviour results as a interaction of socio-emotional and cogn...
^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'regulating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: regulating
...ontrol due to which teenager challenges to regulate risk prone socio-emotional network as t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43564356436 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90853650008 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8123845852 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102796635319 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342793681579 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313283520774 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582939609417 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025233704951 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.