Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt or suppot on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the possible alternative to the traditional private health insurance. The author of the reading states that although cooperatives are established already in many forms, this new alternative seem to provide more health services. The lecturer partially agree with the author yet he opposes the remaining thoughts.
First, the author begins by stating that since such cooperatives are not run by government or a private organization they do not tend to work for profit. In addition, they are capable enough to offer competition to private insurers as well by providing overall coverage and service. The lecturer further elaborates this by mentioning that there will be no board of director thus administration cost will be less. Furthermore, they are operate by their members itself considering to provide service to general public.
Secondly, according to the writing, they do not need support from taxpayers so they are self sustained. Additionally, they have the caliber to generate independent stream of revenue without having to acquire support from anyone. The professor believes there flaws in the writer's position here. He contends that their work is not quiet effective because they could not approach large size and it will take decades to inject scheme however others could do within 2-3 years.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that they are mutual insurance companies since they have presence is pervasive and already existed. Moreover, they can confer significant service as they are comprised of large members. The speaker on other hand points out that even though they sound plausible, there has been instances of failure in the history. For example, in washington DC non-profit health insurance has been collapsed As we can see, the lecturer agrees on writer's viewpoint on some extent, he effectievely challenges the other ideas of author.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-01 | prakriti malla | 90 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 68
- You have received a gift of money The money is enough to buy either a piece of jwellery you like or tickets to a sconcert you want to attend Which would you buy Use specific reasons or details to support your answer 70
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighbourhood Do you support or oppose this plan Why Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 70
- Technological progress has made the world a better place Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Use specific details and examples to support your answer 86
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e seem to provide more health services. The lecturer partially agree with the autho...
^^^
Line 2, column 436, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'operated'.
Suggestion: operated
...ost will be less. Furthermore, they are operate by their members itself considering to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considering providing'.
Suggestion: considering providing
...hey are operate by their members itself considering to provide service to general public. Secondly, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...tself considering to provide service to general public. Secondly, according to the writing, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to support'?
Suggestion: to support
...ording to the writing, they do not need support from taxpayers so they are self sustain...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 470, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...d As we can see, the lecturer agrees on writers viewpoint on some extent, he effectieve...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34333333333 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74447120995 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5956301937 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.866666667 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152261573534 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490659970933 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319899939615 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866244609048 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319242327828 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.