Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they contrast with specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and the listening discuss pruning. The article states that it controls the size of a tree. However, the lecture contrasts with specific points made in the reading passage. The professor says that pruning needs to be done wisely otherwise it can cause severe damages.
The first point the professor makes is that if the pruning is poorly done, it needs to be removed. It is going to force the side branches and this can cause damages to a car. This point contrasts the point made in the reading. The latter states that pruning flourishes trees and makes large branches challenge small ones.
Furthermore, the professor points out that when the trees start flourish with poor pruning its leave and breaches will cause damage as well. Therefore, The leaves will need to be removed or broken. This contrasts the information from the reading. According to the passage the aim of pruning is to improve the tree shape.
Finally, the lecture states that in order to avert further issues the tree should be destroyed. This point contrasts the reading's key point. According to the article pruning should be done only to take away broken branches.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-11 | edsonsimoes | 60 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | edsonsimoes | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they differ from specific points made in the reading passage. 70
- People usually mix their private and professional life.What are the pros and cons 65
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they support specific points made in the reading passage. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 196.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90306122449 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34717722835 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 145.348785872 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2308453199 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.0666666667 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0666666667 21.698381199 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283235876459 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114632447097 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159203441409 0.0662205650399 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192305827488 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702518471615 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.25 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.