Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

The lecture casts doubts on the readings' key points.
According to the lecture, the research made on foods is purely exaggeration. First, the studies on blueberries are exciting but they have been doing only in animals not in people. Second, there has been a misleading in differentiating certain foods. For example, there are no promisses that tomatoes help to prevent diseases and broccoli may not help to prevent as well. Third, it is not true that garlic is a powerful food because its effects are not clear, after six month the effects disappear. The research is poorly designed on scientific method to draw any conclusion about food.
However, according to the reading, foods are part of our daily diet and do help to prevent diseases. Some researches show that blueberries, tomatoes, broccoli, garlic and cabbage are powerful foods which help to combat many maladies of our bodies and help the prevention of some strongest ones.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-29 Opak Pulup 3 view
2019-12-29 NIMA SAEEDI 3 view
2019-12-29 NIMA SAEEDI 3 view
2019-12-24 NIMA SAEEDI 80 view
2019-12-23 NIMA SAEEDI 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user edsonsimoes :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 1373.03311258 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 155.0 270.72406181 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05161290323 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6903612591 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651612903226 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 419.366225166 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9722915181 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0681059148324 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388125313365 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642380812414 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741586633994 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068924999437 0.0443174109184 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster


Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.