Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage.
The article states about a topic called Altruism. Altruism is a kind of behavior in which an animal or a human sacrifices their own interest for the sake of other animal or human. However, the professor explains that for doing this type of sacrifices, they all have some self-benefit.
First, the reading provides an example of altruism among human. Human donates his vital organ to their relative and sometimes to the stranger without taking any benefit or reward. On the other hand, the professor refutes this point by saying that after giving something to other people, you will get a lot of appreciation from others. For some human, this non-material thing like appreciation means a lot to him/her. They prefer this kind of reward more than other reward.
Second, the article gives an example of mammal called meerkat. This kind of mammal act as a standing guard when their other mates consuming their food. Whenever, the meerkat see a predator like hawk, it creates an alarm cry for alerting the other meerkat. This act is a great example of altruism. However, the professor posits that many researcher have found that before providing guard to the other meerkat, it eats their food first. After creating an alarm cry when it sees a predator, it immediately run from their place. So all meerkat have same amount of risk. That's why we cannot state that this is a pure sacrifice without taking any benefit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | Al Ahad | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | Kyunghwan Kim | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Shreya Nuguri | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | Anvita | 3 | view |
| 2019-03-15 | edsonsimoes | 60 | view |
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think better? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture about Altruism, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage about Altruism. 75
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other field is by instiling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun researcher seems to be countable; consider using: 'many researchers'.
Suggestion: many researchers
...ism. However, the professor posits that many researcher have found that before providing guard ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'runs'?
Suggestion: runs
...when it sees a predator, it immediately run from their place. So all meerkat have s...
^^^
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'amounted'.
Suggestion: amounted
...m their place. So all meerkat have same amount of risk. Thats why we cannot state that...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...o all meerkat have same amount of risk. Thats why we cannot state that this is a pure...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87966804979 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45119015783 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56846473029 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7509259132 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0625 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0353295887616 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0124737643267 0.0996497079465 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0223376604153 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0299395824721 0.162205337803 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022287748353 0.0443174109184 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.3589403974 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.