Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading passage and the lecture discuss whether communal encyclopedias are better than traditional ones. The author states that the opportunity to use the site for all Internet users made it unreliable, unverified and trivial. The lecturer disagrees with each point made in the reading and suggests that despite these shortcomings, there are special programs that combat intruders, errors and make the information valuable.
First of all, the reading argues that client’s lack of academic credentials leads to inaccuracy, which does not occur on professional’s paper encyclopedias. However, the speaker contends that although there are errors, it is mostly humans’ prejudice as flaws are seen everywhere. In addition, online mistakes are usually easily removed than the printed ones.
Secondly, it is claimed that as every user can tweak articles, there can be vandals and hackers, who confuses ordinary readers. The lecturer undermines this point by mentioning modern strategies against corrections of totally authentic information. Moreover, special editors monitor site's activity daily, looking for each fix there.
Finally, the article states that truistic topics make communal encyclopedias a gathering of unnecessary and superfluous data, which is thoroughly filtered in traditional books. In the lecture, the professor expresses his approval towards this variety of interests for each user. The absence of popularized themes he explains by the lack of space on paper, which gives an advantage to online encyclopedia and its approach.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... it unreliable, unverified and trivial. The lecturer disagrees with each point made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78260869565 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9644905395 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673913043478 0.540411800872 125% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0734500748 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162594775537 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487166155894 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605520374134 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875273905698 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877542224481 0.0443174109184 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.8541721854 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.2367328918 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.31 8.42419426049 134% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... it unreliable, unverified and trivial. The lecturer disagrees with each point made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78260869565 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9644905395 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673913043478 0.540411800872 125% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0734500748 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162594775537 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487166155894 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605520374134 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875273905698 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877542224481 0.0443174109184 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.8541721854 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.2367328918 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.31 8.42419426049 134% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.