tax on ciggaret is fair
The reading states that imposing high taxes on cigarretes and other unhealthy food will benefit society and will lead to heathy bevavior and provides three reasons of support. However, the the professor explains that it would not lead to healthy society neccessarily and refutes each of author's reason.
First, the reading states that the taxes on cigarretes and unhealthy food will lead to discourage people from smoking and eating these foods. The professor refutes this point, and explain that the high taxes on ciggaretes would force smoker to buy a cheaper cigarretes as we know these cigarrets have more dangerous material in comparison to high quality cigarretes , so it makes them more endangered.
Second, the reading claims that these taxes are fair because people with healthy behavior should not cover the medical costs. However, the professor refutes this point and say that imposing high taxes on cigarrete and unheathy food is not fair at all because people with high income and low income pay the same amount of their payment for these behavior it is not fair at all.
Third, the reading states that taxe like these will provide a financial source for government and all society would benefit from this.The professor refutes this point and say that it is possible that government used to these resources and would not tend to loose this taxes consequently do not prevent people from smoking in public place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-10 | madgal | 71 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | Hoseingitinejad | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | Hoseingitinejad | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ides three reasons of support. However, the the professor explains that it would not le...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ides three reasons of support. However, the the professor explains that it would not le...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and refutes each of authors reason. First, the reading states that the taxes...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in comparison to high quality cigarretes , so it makes them more endangered. ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s , so it makes them more endangered. Second, the reading claims that these ta...
^^^^
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these taxes are fair because people with healthy behavior should not cover the me...
^^
Line 4, column 345, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this behavior' or 'these behaviors'?
Suggestion: this behavior; these behaviors
...ay the same amount of their payment for these behavior it is not fair at all. Third, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hese behavior it is not fair at all. Third, the reading states that taxe like...
^^^^
Line 6, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...and all society would benefit from this.The professor refutes this point and say th...
^^^
Line 6, column 262, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...o these resources and would not tend to loose this taxes consequently do not prevent ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt people from smoking in public place.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09361702128 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36937922553 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.6409348198 49.2860985944 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.0 110.228320801 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5714285714 21.698381199 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215943526891 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101037013463 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592226135112 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121658956353 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623597969993 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.3589403974 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.