TOEFL T P O 1 Integrated Writing Task

While the reading suggests four day work week can be advantageous for both company, employee and job opportunities, the lecture disapproves this idea based on three main reasons.

To start, the passage claims that four-day work week with 80% of full time employee salary can reduce companies profit. Although the lecture believes not only it will not affect the profit of the company but it demands spending much more money. For instance, if the company hire new employees investing in their training and medical benefit is essential. Also, the should provide more offices and computers which can rise the initial money that should be spent.

Secondly, the passage claims that if more workers choose four week option, there will be more job openings.However what the lecturer claims is that employers may make workers to stay overtime to avoid hiring new forces. Also, they may graze their expectation and demand their employees to do same amount of job in less working hours which will put them under more pressure.

At last, the lecture disagrees with what the passage states about having more free time to enhance lifestyle. First, he states that this workers tend to have lower rank of job stability and are more likely to be the first to lose their jobs in case of economical depression. As well as that, the companies would prefer job positions such as management to be present at all working hours to be up to dated.

To sum up, although the passage believes less working hours can be helpful in many ways, the lecture thinks otherwise.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...hile the reading suggests four day work week can be advantageous for both company, e...
^^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ims that four-day work week with 80% of full time employee salary can reduce companies pr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...option, there will be more job openings.However what the lecturer claims is that employ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...option, there will be more job openings.However what the lecturer claims is that employ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nhance lifestyle. First, he states that this workers tend to have lower rank of job...
^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this workers tend to have lower rank of job stability and are more likely to be ...
^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...the first to lose their jobs in case of economical depression. As well as that, the compan...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, to sum up, as well as that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93893129771 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45889226212 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583969465649 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1506143841 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.636363636 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.