TOEFL T P O 20 Integrated Writing Task

Both the lecture and the passage discuss the consequences of the policy named “let it burn “which the United States has relied on it to refuse to control forest fires. They analyze the Yellowstone fire as one of the major fires of time. The passage mentioned several reasons to confirm that forest fires would cause damage which the speaker contradicts with them and distinguish the fire as a not destructive occurrence.

For the first reason, they begin with the impression of it on plants. The passage notes that a vast amount of land and trees were destroyed by fire and Yellowstone known as a national park became a wrecked land. The speaker opposes that by assuming the disaster as a chance for new plants to grow, like plants with the necessity for heat.

Secondly, the writer considers the wildlife whose natural habitat is destroyed and they won't return after their escaping. On the other hand, the lecture claims that it is a new opportunity for some specie to live and make the food chain stronger.
In the end, the passage knows the tourism industry gets endangered in scorched places. Where the lecturer asserts that fire incident doesn't happen constantly so there is no need to worry for tourists and this industry will survive.

In the end, the passage knows the tourism industry gets endangered in scorched places. Where the lecturer asserts that fire incident doesn't happen constantly so there is no need to worry for tourists and this industry will survive.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...ss the consequences of the policy named “let it burn “which the United States has...
^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...uences of the policy named “let it burn “which the United States has relied on it...
^
Line 6, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...the lecturer asserts that fire incident doesnt happen constantly so there is no need t...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 181, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
...appen constantly so there is no need to worry for tourists and this industry will survive...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 134, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...the lecturer asserts that fire incident doesnt happen constantly so there is no need t...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 182, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
...appen constantly so there is no need to worry for tourists and this industry will survive...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93227091633 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45531484235 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517928286853 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2731726701 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.166666667 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.