The author of the reading believes that the idea of decreasing the time of working from five days to four it will be beneficial for the companies and employees as well.
The lecturer cast doubt on the claims made in the article, he thinks that decreasing hours work may costly.
First of all the author point that the employee will have reste and be alert thus, will be less errors and more productivity.
It is mentioned that if the employee worked four days instead five they will payed for eighty percent so, the companies can hire more employees.
This point is challenged by the lecturer, he says that more employees means more costs a new employee needs to have medical coverage, new desk, a new computer.
Secondly, the author says that the employees will have more time to enjoy their habits and spend time with their families, wich will have a positive impact on them.
The lecturer says that companies can keep same number of employees but creates more opportunities such as overtime.
In conclusion, the author and the lecturer are totally in contrast the first encourage the idea the decrease the employee’s days of work from five to four while the lecturer don’t agree and believe that is costly for the employers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun errors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...l have reste and be alert thus, will be less errors and more productivity. It is me...
^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'pay'
Suggestion: pay
...worked four days instead five they will payed for eighty percent so, the companies ca...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...nged by the lecturer, he says that more employees means more costs a new employee needs t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87323943662 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52929234289 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516431924883 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.6088295081 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.75 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.875 7.06452816374 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.09492273731 195% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384503765756 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18535356604 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922373983454 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18535356604 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922373983454 0.0443174109184 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.