The lecturer disputes the idea that working four days a week in stead of five days is beneficial to the economy and may increase companies profits. He asserts that shortening the number of working days may increase companies spending's and have a negative effect on the economy.
First, the lecturer argues that there are other hidden costs after hiring more employees in spite of the same total paid wages . The author claims that companies would benefit from having employees working four days instead of five days because they are more alert and they can avoid mistakes at work. However, the lecturer states that having more employees means that there is a need for more office space. Beside, the bills of medical insurance would also be higher.Thus the total companies spending's will increase
Second, the lecturer contends that implementing a four days working schedule policy does not necessarily creates more jobs. He says that companies would require their employees to work overtime to compensate for the shortage of employees and will raise their expectations about productivity. Thus, having this policy will not result in reducing the unemployment rates.
Finally, the lecturer argues that employees will not have a better quality of life. He asserts that it is true that working four days a week instead of five will give employees more time to do more their leisure activities. However, at the same time, it may stop the chances of being promoted in their jobs. Moreover, if the companies decided to down size because of a poor economy, those employees will be the first to quite their jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
... the idea that working four days a week in stead of five days is beneficial to the economy ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increase companies spendings and have a negative effect on the economy. First...
^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...es in spite of the same total paid wages . The author claims that companies would ...
^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...r, the lecturer states that having more employees means that there is a need for more off...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
... medical insurance would also be higher.Thus the total companies spendings will incr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... medical insurance would also be higher.Thus the total companies spendings will incr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he lecturer contends that implementing a four days working schedule policy does n...
^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...ng schedule policy does not necessarily creates more jobs. He says that companies would...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06390977444 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47685919274 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3982686547 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515142107833 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194865293093 0.0996497079465 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874551739961 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329394523751 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723164325225 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.