In general, both the reading passage and the lecture discuss how a group of people can plan and work on projects. The author’s passage affirms that a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills to possess than any single individual to work. However, in the lecture, a company decided have teams to work and plan new projects, in contrast to some team’s characteristics in the passage.
First of all, creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make decisions than an individual might not undertake as the author’s reading says. Even though, the lecture affirmed that one or two people can have solutions and influence a team about a decision. Meanwhile, in the passage, a member group can have a decision better than a group. On the other hand, ideas and decisions can come easily into the group and quickly drop out because of those influencers. As a result, all the group is blamed for the situation on the lecture.
Secondly, the author’s claims that a team member has a much better chance to “shine”, to get his or her ideas and contributions highly significant. However, the lecturer affirms that a team can have ideas and greater impact, solve problems faster that only one person and with productivity.
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing TaskSummarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In general, both the reading passage and...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...following reasons why the projects. First of all, creative solutions come ab...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed for the situation on the lecture. Secondly, the author's claims that ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, in general, as a result, first of all, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96222766336 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549107142857 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.64207247 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.818181818 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 7.06452816374 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502506479802 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184925876402 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921003182942 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321397546667 0.162205337803 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12942236254 0.0443174109184 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.