In the set of material, both the Reading passage and lecture discuss about the “great houses”. The author and lecturer have diferents opinions about the evidences to support them theories.
First of all, the Reading passage porpouse that Chaco structures were purely residential, with each housing hundreds of people. Morever said that the Chaco houses appear strikingly similar to the large, like apartments buildings. However, the lecturer affirms that outside the structure was really apartment buildings, but inside, many people live then. Once example of the lecturer was that each Family live in the own apartment, around 10 family.
In the second place, the Reading said that Chaco people was grain maize, which could be stored for long periods of time without spoiling and could serve as a long-lasting supply of food. But, the lecturer said that they have not access to container or big containers.
Third and last, the Reading claim that archaeologists identified an enormous mound fomed by a pile of material. Excavations of the mound revealed deposits containing a surprisingly large number of broken pots. Even though, the lecturer affirms this not support idea. She said that bronken pots have a large containing and with new material.
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 15 Integrated Writing Task 73
- Independent Task from Toefl Sampler 3
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the set of material, both the Reading...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e evidences to support them theories. First of all, the Reading passage porpou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, second, then, third, first of all, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.335 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65777632618 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3345522813 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9166666667 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331267348326 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109731870888 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731191583022 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183821212923 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662061927541 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.