TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task
In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge，expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to “shine”, to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team’s overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.
The reading and lecture discusses about result of devolving a company project to a group of people which may or may not help advancing the project. The author claims that devolving a project to a group of people will help better advancing the project and improvement of group members while the lecturer cast doubt on claims.
First, the reading expresses that because of having more resources of people the project will go ahead faster. This point is challenged by professor; he says that it take more time to a group project go on and pointed out in some cases many meetings and discussions is needed to reach consensus on how the project should go ahead.
Second, the author mentioned that more creative solutions would be presented which help progress of project and believes distribution of responsibility over the group provide more risk tolerability which cause members propose more creative solutions. This professor rebut this argument by discussing that some of group members influence greatly on group discussion which may manage group discussions in a way that some ideas neglected and some wrong ideas accepted without letting enough discussion on probable failure of this solutions but when project fails all members will be blamed.
Third point that reading expresses is that group projects make members feel better because they are not forced to work and greater results of a group project that is unachievable by a personal project provide them opportunity to shine. However the lecturer disagrees and says that the result of group project measured as a whole without reflecting each person’s performance so there is no chance to show their performance. Also, some investigations show some group members don’t feel good in group projects.
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing TaskIn many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 83
- Essay topics: TPO-01 - Integrated Writing TaskIn the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory p 73
- Essay topics: TPO-04 - Integrated Writing TaskEndotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the envi 86
- Essay topics: TPO-03 - Integrated Writing TaskRembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attr 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to advance' or 'advance'.
Suggestion: to advance; advance
...oup of people which may or may not help advancing the project. The author claims that dev...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the group provide more risk tolerability which cause members propose more creativ...
^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'rebuts'.
Suggestion: rebuts
...more creative solutions. This professor rebut this argument by discussing that some o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nough discussion on probable failure of this solutions but when project fails all me...
^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ject provide them opportunity to shine. However the lecturer disagrees and says that th...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'while', 'in some cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.297385620915 0.261695866417 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.183006535948 0.158904122519 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0490196078431 0.0723426182421 68% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0392156862745 0.0435111971325 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.016339869281 0.0277247811725 59% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133986928105 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0522875816993 0.0370669169778 141% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72642190857 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0228758169935 0.0208969081088 109% => OK
Particles: 0.00326797385621 0.00154638098197 211% => OK
Determiners: 0.111111111111 0.128158765124 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0261437908497 0.0158828679856 165% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0228758169935 0.0114777025283 199% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1767.0 1645.83664459 107% => OK
No of words: 285.0 271.125827815 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.2 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.39298245614 0.374372842146 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.322807017544 0.287516216867 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182456140351 0.187439937562 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133333333333 0.113142543107 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72642190857 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512280701754 0.539623497131 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.5407548035 53.8517498576 94% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 31.6666666667 21.7502111507 146% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.42586591 49.3711431718 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 196.333333333 132.220823453 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 21.7502111507 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 0.878197800319 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 63.9473684211 50.5018328374 127% => OK
Elegance: 2.02739726027 1.90840788429 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.531760885689 0.549887131256 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.184181082187 0.142949733639 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0889652878381 0.0787303798458 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.700740693232 0.631733273073 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.132617880458 0.139662658121 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275586845577 0.266732575781 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782982111206 0.103435571967 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.3184247409 0.414875509568 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0352066731659 0.0530846634433 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.373747948662 0.40443939384 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488788556688 0.0528353158467 93% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.