The text is about a famous painter, Rembrandt, who was described as a well-know and expert artist in the past. The reading mentioned that one of his paintings should not be attributed to him due to several mistakes found on it. The painting in question is a portrait of a elderly woman's face, which shows many inconsistencies such as, the type of her dress and luxurious items. It also stated that Rembrandt is a master in painting shadow and light, which could not be found in the painting. Finally, the reading revealed several pieces of wood glued in the painting frame used by Rembrandt, which was highly unusual on his work. The professor strongly disagree with the text and stated the reasons as per mentioned below.
Firstly, the text mentioned about the inconsistencies found on the painting. The lecture contradicts this statement saying that the items painted on the woman's face portrait were added later on to increase the value of the painting and show that the elderly woman was some how a rich person.
Secondly, the reading talked about the shadow and light imperfections. The professor refutes this idea stating that the reflections shown in the painting was due to a white cloth used by the woman, which makes reflected light in a different way.
Thirdly, the passage says about several pieces of wood glued on the painting frame, which was highly unusual for Rembrandt's work. However, the lecturer stated that these pieces was used to enlarge the frame and make it bigger, in the way the painting would have a better value in the market. The professor also stated that the same piece of wood used in the woman's face frame was also found in one of his works when he painted himself.
In conclusion, the lecture contradicts all the three statements found in the reading and also set relevant examples to confirm his claims about the genuineness of Rembrandt's portrait.
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 81
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 76
- Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live. 76
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 60
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...im due to several mistakes found on it. The painting in question is a portrait of a...
^^^
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e painting in question is a portrait of a elderly womans face, which shows many i...
^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: SOME_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somehow'?
Suggestion: somehow
...ing and show that the elderly woman was some how a rich person. Secondly, the reading...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the woman, which makes reflected light in a different way. Thirdly, the passage says about sev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87306501548 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5685289766 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467492260062 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.667559871 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.428571429 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460756654058 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171800114636 0.0996497079465 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982097295065 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249369549667 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122124796451 0.0443174109184 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.